Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co., 469 So. 2d 967.

999 citing documents.

Jones v. Hyatt Corp. of Delaware 681 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Ramirez v. Ware 680 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., Gray v. Louisiana Downs, supra ; (La.
Odom v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 688 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
In Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., the supreme court indicated the factors which may be considered in apportioning fault.
Hundley v. Harper Truck Line, Inc. 681 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Cooper v. City of New Orleans 680 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Co., the Supreme Court set forth five factors which may influence the degree of fault assigned: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct, (4) the capaciti
Holt v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 680 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Hollie v. Beauregard Parish Police Jury 680 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
the supreme court stated: "[i]n determining the percentages of fault, the trier of fact shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relationship between the conduct and the damages claimed."
Hickman v. Exide, Inc. 679 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Hataway v. Jeep Corp. 679 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Faul v. Bonin 678 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Thornhill v. STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. 676 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The Louisiana Supreme Court, set forth the guidelines for apportioning fault under the doctrine of comparative negligence.
Leatherman v. Riverside Village 676 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Clement, 666 So.2d at 611
Hurts v. Woodis 676 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Co., : both truck drivers were professional operators and therefore in a superior position vis-à-vis Brown....
Payton v. City of New Orleans 679 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Harvey v. Ouachita Parish School Bd. 674 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Co., and Coley v. State, through DOTD, (La.App.
Brian v. O.S. Johnson Construction Co. 676 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Johnson v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. 675 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Mix v. Krewe of Petronius 675 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Co., quoted with approval in Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol.
Jones v. Peyton Place, Inc. 675 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Co., : (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger; (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct; (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct; (4) whether the capacities of the actors were superior or inferior; (5) whether any extenuating circumstanc
Kimble v. East Baton Rouge Parish 673 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Killough v. Bituminous Cas. Corp. 674 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Steadman v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 672 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The Louisiana Supreme Court, (La.
Gibson v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 674 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Co., the court explained the appropriate considerations for a comparative fault analysis, as follows: In assessing the nature of the conduct of the parties, various factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the da
Couvillion v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 672 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Gibson v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 674 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Co., the court explained the appropriate considerations for a comparative fault analysis, as follows: In assessing the nature of the conduct of the parties, various factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the da
Saurage v. Palermo 672 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Holt v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP & DEV. 671 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Holt v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 671 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Allen v. Rawlins 669 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Huff v. Union Pacific Railroad 670 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc. 666 So. 2d 1073 La. 1996
Co., Arceneaux, supra at 1333 .
Ventress v. Union Pacific RR Co. 666 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Clement v. Frey 666 So. 2d 607 La. 1996
Hill v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury 666 So. 2d 612 La. 1996
Dawson v. City of Bogalusa 669 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
COMPARATIVE FAULT In Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, the supreme court set forth *454 five factors which may influence the degree of fault assigned: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct, (4) the cap
Guzman v. State 664 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Stockstill v. CF Industries, Inc. 665 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Duplantis v. Danos 664 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
The Louisiana Supreme Court, set forth the guidelines for apportioning fault under the doctrine of comparative negligence.
Summerall v. Ouachita Parish School Bd. 665 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Sloan v. Dailey 664 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
The Louisiana Supreme Court, (La.
Matthews v. Ferrer 665 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Morris v. State, Dept. of Transp. 664 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Co., we conclude the apportionment of fault made by the trial court is not manifestly erroneous.
Dowden v. Mid State Sand & Gravel Co. 664 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Thomas v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 662 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Miller v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury 663 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Co., (quoting the Uniform Comparative Fault Act § 2(b)).
Hatten v. Price 663 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Branch v. City of Lafayette 663 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Boutte v. Nissan Motor Corp. 663 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Ayres v. Beauregard Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 663 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Gardner v. McDonald 660 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by