Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co., 469 So. 2d 967.

999 citing documents.

Davis v. Husqvarna Motor 561 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Williams v. Stevenson 558 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Mitchell v. Clark Equipment Co. 561 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Socorro v. Orleans Levee Bd. 561 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
The standard to be used in assigning percentages of fault was enunciated by our Supreme Court in Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., : ...
Llorence v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 558 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
SUCCESSION OF THEROIT v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 560 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Jaffarzad v. Jones Truck Lines, Inc. 561 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., Attales v. Shelter Mut.
Rosell v. ESCO 558 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Devereux v. Allstate Ins. Co. 557 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Hardy v. Cumis Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Brooks v. City of Baton Rouge 558 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Co., the Supreme Court indicated which factors should be considered in order to apportion fault under a system of comparative fault: "In determining the percentages of fault, the trier of fact shall consider both the nature of the conduct of each party at fault and the extent of the causal relation between t
Jones v. Thomas 557 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Thus, would be applicable in determining plaintiff's fault, if any.
Nichols v. US Rentals, Inc. 556 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Sicarelli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 556 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Kennedy v. Parrino 555 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
A review of the trial court's reasons for judgment shows that the judge believed that Kennedy's words and second confrontation with Parrino, while not justifying his actual battery, helped cause the physical results of the confrontation, and assessed Kennedy with ten percent (10%) fault, based on compartive negligence factors set out in Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., and restated in Harris, 499 So.2d at 504 .
Michelli v. Steve 554 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Leckelt v. Eunice Superette, Inc. 555 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
In Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, the Louisiana Supreme Court has set forth the proper factors to consider in assigning a degree of fault to each party: (1) Whether the conduct resulted from an inadvertance or involved an awareness of danger.
Pelt v. City of DeRidder 553 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Pittman v. Pomeroy 552 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
3rd Cir.1979), writ denied, Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
Falgoust v. Richardson Industries, Inc. 552 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
McGowan v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 555 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Cupstid v. Harrison Hardwood Mfg. Co. 552 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
*1227 973-4 (La.1985), the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth guidelines in apportioning comparative fault.
Nichols v. Stone Container Corp. 552 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
White v. McCoy 552 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Day v. South Line Equipment Co. 551 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Risk v. State 549 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Jones v. Gateway Realty, Inc. 550 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Co., as setting guidelines for apportioning comparative fault between a plaintiff at fault and multiple defendant offenders.
Ledoux v. Chandrasekaran 551 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
Miller v. Ouachita Parish Police Jury 550 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Rosell v. Esco 549 So. 2d 840 La. 1989
Doucet v. B & R Petroleum Services, Inc. 546 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-4 (La.1985), the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth guidelines in apportioning comparative fault.
Dill v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 545 So. 2d 994 La. 1989
Considering the factors outlined in Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., we fix DOTD's fault at one-half and Savoie's fault at one-half.
Kelley v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 545 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Crupe v. Huval Bakery, Inc. 544 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, Theriot v. St.
Trabeau v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 543 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
The trial court correctly analyzed the *1383 (La.
Holloway v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 549 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
we can not' say that the trial court erred in finding Facundus 60% at fault.
St. Hill v. Tabor 542 So. 2d 499 La. 1989
*503 we find Mrs. Falgout, as the owner of the pool and the adult hostess of the party, to be seventy-five percent at fault and Shawn to be twenty-five percent at fault in the drowning.
Gibson v. Dixie Insurance Co. 542 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Weber v. Caterpillar MacHinery Corp. 542 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Matthews v. Diversified Services, Inc. 540 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Following the guidelines set forth in Watson v. State Farm Casualty Ins., Co., we find that Matthews was one-third at fault.
Lee v. Missouri Pacific RR Co. 540 So. 2d 287 La. 1989
Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 539 So. 2d 1212 La. 1989
Snell v. United Parcel Services, Inc. 543 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Rodrigue v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. 540 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
In apportioning fault between co-defendants and Rodrigue, are instructive notwithstanding the distinction that Watson involved apportionment of comparative fault .between tortfeasor and victim, because consideration of the conduct of all actors is necessary to determine varying degrees of fault.
Thomas v. Hartford Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Simpson v. Caddo Parish School Bd. 540 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
once it is determined that the trier of fact is clearly wrong, the appellate court is empowered by the provisions of LSA-C.C.P.
Antley v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA 539 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
St. Hill v. Tabor 532 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Carpenter v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. 537 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Carlin v. Blanchard 537 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988