Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co., 469 So. 2d 967.

999 citing documents.

Lanie Farms, Inc. v. Cleco Power, LLC 259 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Washington v. Onebeacon Am. Ins. Co. 265 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Riley Leblanc v. City of Abbeville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Watson v. State Farm, [].
LeBlanc v. City of Abbeville 259 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Watson v. State Farm , [ ].
McDowell v. Diggs 264 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Woods v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, L.L.C. 251 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
Shephard v. AIX Energy, Inc. 249 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Christina Mink Dauzat v. State Farm Mutual Automobile ins.co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Co., the supreme court provided guidelines for apportioning fault and stated, in pertinent part: In assessing the nature of the conduct of the parties, various factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1) whether the conduct resulted
Christopher Blanchard v. Demetrius J. Hicks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
As to apportioning fault this court has said: the supreme court identified factors to be considered when apportioning fault, explaining: [V]arious factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1)whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2)
Blanchard v. Hicks 244 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
As to apportioning fault this court has said: , 974 (La.1985), the supreme court identified *887 factors to be considered when apportioning fault, explaining: [V]arious factors may influence the degree of fault assigned, including: (1)whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the con
Palir v. Guideone Ins. Co. 243 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
John Palir, III v. Guideone Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Tobice Pritchard v. Geico Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Co., the supreme court addressed the factors to be considered in an appellate review of an allocation of fault.
Pritchard v. Geico Ins. Co. 242 So. 3d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Co., the supreme court addressed the factors to be considered in an appellate review of an allocation of fault.
Amos v. Taylor 244 So. 3d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Goldsby v. Blocker 244 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Jimmy Williams, Sr. v. Placid Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Williams v. Placid Oil Co. 224 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Kodie J. Courville, Et Ux. v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
The factors to consider in an appellate review of an allocation of fault were addressed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
Courville v. Allstate Insurance Co. 215 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
at 1112 , The factors to consider in an appellate review of an allocation of fault were addressed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
Lopez v. Cosey 214 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Smith v. Thomas 214 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Ryan v. Case New Holland, Inc. 211 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Sandalon Jacobs v. David Sampson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Jacobs v. Sampson 206 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Wilson Jolivette v. Ray Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Jolivette v. Hebert 203 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Volentine v. Raeford Farms of Louisiana, LLC 201 So. 3d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Thompson v. Mangham Home Care, Inc. 198 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Massery v. Rouse's Enterprises, L.L.C. 196 So. 3d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., in determining whether a trial court erred in its allocation of fault: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger; (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct; (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct; (4) the capacities of the actor, whet
Aguillard v. Gregory 194 So. 3d 612 La. 2016
Flipping v. JWH Properties, LLC 196 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Panfilo Carrillo v. Billy W. David La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
The assessment of fault is guided by the factors set forth in Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., where the supreme court outlined various factors that influence the percentage of fault assigned to the parties: whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of the danger, (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, (3) the significance of what was sought
Bush v. Mid-South Baking Co. 194 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., including: (1) whether the conduct was inadvertent or involved an awareness of the danger; (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct; (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct; (4) the capacities of the actors; and (5) any extenuating factors which might require the actor to proceed
Thalia Renfro v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rr La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Renfro v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. 193 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Wilson v. Veolia Transportation Services, Inc. 192 So. 3d 245 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2016
Mitch Benson v. Rapides Healthcare System, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
The assessment 15 of fault is guided by the factors set forth in Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., where the supreme court outlined various factors that influence the percentage of fault assigned to the parties.
Benson v. Rapides Healthcare System, L.L.C. 188 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The assessment |1Rof fault is guided by -the factors set forth in Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., where the supreme court outlined various factors that influence the percentage of fault assigned to the' parties.
Virgil McCoy v. Town of Rosepine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
McCoy v. Town of Rosepine 187 So. 3d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Schexnayder v. Bridges 190 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Cyril Prejean v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Prejean v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 183 So. 3d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Moore v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. 186 So. 3d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Patricia Ann Thompson v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. 181 So. 3d 656 La. 2015
Prejeant v. Gray Insurance Co. 176 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., including: (1) whether the conduct was inadvertent or involved an awareness of the danger; (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct; (3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct; (4) the capacities of the actors; and (5) any extenuating factors which might require the actor to proceed
Kenner Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Rusich Detailing, Inc. 175 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., including: 1) whether the conduct was inadvertent or involved an awareness of the danger, 2) how great a risk was created by the conduct, 3) the significance of what was sought by the conduct, 4) the capacities of the actors, and 5) any extenuating factors which might require the actor to proceed with
Solomon v. American National Property & Casualty Co. 175 So. 3d 1024 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Co., the supreme court set forth the following factors to be | ¿considered in reviewing the allocation of fault for manifest error: (1) whether the conduct resulted from inadvertence or involved an awareness of danger; (2) how great a risk was created by the conduct; (3) the significance of what was sought
Oddo v. Asbestos Corp. 173 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015