Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Grice, 462 So. 2d 131.

25 citing documents.

  • Succession of William Dalton Pelt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    appeal dism’d, 473 U.S. 901, 105 S.Ct.
  • In re Pelt 244 So. 3d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    See Succession of Grice , appeal dism'd , 473 U.S. 901 , 105 S.Ct.
  • Washington v. Magnolia Manor Nursing Home & Rehab., L.L.C. 247 So. 3d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    In Succession of Grice , (La.
  • Succession of Younger 206 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    appeal dismissed, 473 U.S. 901 , 105 S.Ct.
  • In re Succession of Bailey 82 So. 3d 322 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
    Appellants contend the compelling state interest found to support Article 209’s age restriction in appeal dismissed, 473 U.S. 901 , 105 S.Ct.
  • Sumner v. MUNICI-ADAMS 986 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Matherne v. Broussard 959 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Jeanmarie v. Butler 942 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    [2] In the the Louisiana Supreme Court performed an extensive analysis of several U.S. Supreme Court cases before upholding the constitutionality of La.
  • Succession of Samuel McKay, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The constitutionality of Article 209 was clearly resolved by the Louisiana Supreme Court in appeal dismissed, 473 U.S. 901, 105 S.Ct.
  • In Re Succession of McKay 921 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    The constitutionality of Article 209 was clearly resolved by the Louisiana Supreme Court in appeal dismissed, 473 U.S. 901 , 105 S.Ct.
  • Gibbs v. Delatte 927 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    In the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the time limitations as those limitations related to successions, reasoning that the limitations were "substantially related to the state's interest in providing for the just and orderly disposition of a decedent's property where paternal inheritan
  • Succession of Young 732 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    n. 3 (La.1985); (La.App.
  • Sudwischer v. Estate of Huffpauir 705 So. 2d 724 La. 1997
    Trimble v. Gordon, 430 U.S. 762 , 97 S.Ct.
  • Succession of Burton 662 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    This very question was addressed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in the a case which incidently, is cited by Augustine Crier for a different proposition.
  • Pace v. STATE THROUGH LA. STATE EMP. RET. SYSTEM 648 So. 2d 1302 La. 1995
    (statutory provision requiring that filiation action be filed within one year of child's majority held to substantially further the state's important interest in providing for the just and orderly disposition of a decedent's property at death where paternal inheritance is concerned).
  • Talley v. Succession of Stuckey 614 So. 2d 55 La. 1993
  • Talley v. Succession of Stuckey 604 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    In the Louisiana Supreme Court found LSA-C.C.
  • Gauthreaux v. Rheem Mfg. Co. 588 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • Chatelain v. STATE, DOTD 566 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    For a sampling of cases interpreting the law in this area, (La.App.
  • In re the Succession of Davis 509 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    The limitation of 209(C) that the action be brought within nineteen years of birth or within one year of the alleged parent’s death, whichever occurs first, has been upheld as constitutional by the Louisiana Supreme Court in dismissed for lack of federal question, 473 U.S. 901 , 105 S.Ct.
  • O'BANNON FOR O'BANNON v. Azar 506 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Matter of Succession of Stevenson 492 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Succession of Sanders 485 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • Griffin v. SUCCESSION OF BRANCH EX REL. SMITH 480 So. 2d 313 La. 1986
    is cited for the proposition that the "possible unconstitutional application of Act 720 has been rejected by this Court."
  • Griffin v. SUCCESSION OF BRANCH EX REL. SMITH 479 So. 2d 324 La. 1985