Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hogan v. Hogan, 465 So. 2d 73.
- David E. Allie v. Sonja Ellis Allie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- Allie v. Allie 80 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Langley v. Langley 982 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- Hester v. Hester 804 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
- Distinguished Rosenbloom v. Bauchat 654 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- Kessel v. Kessel 624 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Broussard v. Broussard 617 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
-
Ellefson v. Ellefson
616 So. 2d 221
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
She argues that the child support provision of the consent judgment in her case is not modifiable because of its limiting language and that the court should have enforced the consent agreement, (La.App.
-
Clinton v. Clinton
598 So. 2d 711
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Initially, our court had reversed and rendered its own decree increasing a (La.App.
- Hogan v. Hogan 549 So. 2d 267 La. 1989
- Abbott v. Dunlap 541 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- Perez v. Hogan 534 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Somme v. Sirmon 524 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
Perez v. Hogan
468 So. 2d 1207
La. 1985
Prior report: La.App., .