Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 458 So. 2d 1308.
-
Rick v. State, Through DOTD
619 So. 2d 1149
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Gauthier v. O'BRIEN
618 So. 2d 825
La. 1993
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., *829
-
Taylor v. Giddens
618 So. 2d 834
La. 1993
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Lindon v. Terminix Services, Inc.
617 So. 2d 1251
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
and Long v. Northeast Soil Conserv.
-
Hillman v. Akins
614 So. 2d 234
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
In Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.
-
Deville v. Budd Const. Co.
617 So. 2d 570
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Long v. Northeast Soil Conserv.
-
Young v. Armadores De Cabotaje, SA
617 So. 2d 517
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
See Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Cornett v. STATE THROUGH WO MOSS REG. HOSP
614 So. 2d 189
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
art. 1880; Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Travers-Wakeford v. St.
-
Cornett v. State ex rel. W.O. Moss Regional Hospital
614 So. 2d 189
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
art. 1880; Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Travers-Wakeford v. St.
-
City of Kenner v. Southeast Equipment Co.
611 So. 2d 785
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
13:5105, barring jury trials against a governmental subdivision, is unconstitutional.” Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
State v. Albritton
610 So. 2d 209
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
In Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "The only assertions initially made by plaintiff in his response to the S & WB's application in the Court of Appeal and in his assignment of error in the writ application to this Court was that the trial judge correctly determined that he should follow La.C.C.P.
-
Thompson v. Capital Steel Co.
613 So. 2d 178
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
See Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Thompson v. Capital Steel Co.
621 So. 2d 1101
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
See Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
State v. Riche
608 So. 2d 639
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
See Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (5th Cir.1988).
-
Joseph v. Cannon
609 So. 2d 838
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
the judge was not bound by the jury's findings with regard to the suit against the City; and in his own judgment, the judge found that plaintiff had failed to prove the elements of malicious prosecution against Alonzo.
- Spears v. Broussard 602 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
Hodges Ward Purrington Properties v. Lee
601 So. 2d 358
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., writ denied Travers-Wakeford v. St.
- In Re RWT Applying for Adoption of JD 594 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- In re R.W.T. 594 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
-
McCullough v. Regional Transit Authority
593 So. 2d 731
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Keith v. Gallioto
592 So. 2d 510
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Haney v. Francewar
588 So. 2d 1172
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Melton v. General Electric Company, Inc., Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
- Brown v. Williams 587 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
-
Bays v. Estate of Zeringue
584 So. 2d 715
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 24th Judicial Dist.
-
Travers-Wakeford v. St. Pierre
585 So. 2d 580
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., writ denied at and at
-
Guidry v. Frank Guidry Oil Co.
579 So. 2d 947
La. 1991
Interpreting the amendment, Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., held that a jury interrogatory on the fault of a party immune from trial by jury was mandatory when supported by the evidence.
-
Melton v. General Elec. Co., Inc.
579 So. 2d 448
La. 1991
The court of appeal reversed on the ground that the jury should have considered any negligence of the employer, relying on Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., LSA-C.C.P.
-
Perez v. State, Through DOTD
578 So. 2d 1199
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
See also Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Dubois v. State Farm Ins. Co.
571 So. 2d 201
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Vaughn v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS
566 So. 2d 1021
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.
-
Melton v. General Electric Co.
566 So. 2d 98
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
In Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the purpose and reason for the amendment: “With the adoption of comparative fault ...
-
Bruce v. Rogers Oil Tool Services, Inc.
556 So. 2d 922
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
[2] We do not find Lemire v. New Orleans Public Ser., Inc., requiring the court to submit special interrogatories to the jury, applicable in this action.
-
McIntosh v. Madison Parish Police Jury
554 So. 2d 227
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
The effect of Act 931 of 1988, adding subsections E and F to § 1415 effective July 26, 1988, was not raised in the trial court or here and is not considered by us. See Lamire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Duplessis v. Kliebert
548 So. 2d 358
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
article 1880 and Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Veal v. Forrest
543 So. 2d 1121
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.
- Smiley v. Sikes 543 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- Champagne v. Champagne 541 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
-
Lee v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.
540 So. 2d 1083
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Artigue v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
537 So. 2d 1238
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.
-
Murphy v. City of New Orleans
537 So. 2d 1183
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
article 1812(C)(2) in its decision in Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service *1186 Inc., stated, "With the adoption of comparative fault (C.C.
-
State v. Tanner
534 So. 2d 535
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 24 (La.
-
State, in Interest of Ja
532 So. 2d 943
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Pacholl v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
527 So. 2d 1154
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
See also, Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
24th Judicial Dist. v. Molaison
522 So. 2d 177
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., State in the Interest of J.B., (5th Cir. 1986).
-
Harris v. Estate of Fuller
521 So. 2d 736
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Lamire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
Wong v. East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office
522 So. 2d 1134
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
See also Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.App.
-
Dean v. Terrebonne Parish Police Jury
510 So. 2d 82
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Our supreme court followed this reasoning in Jones, supra at 608 , and in Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
-
City of Baton Rouge v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
500 So. 2d 397
La. 1987
[7] The City-Parish argues that the issue of the unconstitutionality of the various laws is not before this court because that issue was not properly raised in the district court, citing Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., for the proposition that the assertion of unconstitutionality must be pleaded prior to the conclusion of the action in the trial court.
-
Loe v. McNamara
501 So. 2d 298
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
47:1576.” In Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Justice Calogero observed that “[n]ow, in this Court, in brief, [plaintiff] asserts for the first time that ...
-
State in Interest of JB
499 So. 2d 611
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., and no assertion of unconstitutionality was pleaded prior to the brief filed in this court.