Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Whittaker, 463 So. 2d 1270.

29 citing documents.

State v. Sartain 2 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 involved the admissibility of a letter written by the defendant to a friend who was also incarcerated and whom he urged to lie or be silent.
State v. Burbank 811 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Williams 778 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Harper 754 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Lewis 736 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Badon, 95-0452, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Badon 664 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Mayeaux 570 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Davis 562 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
State v. Nicholas 548 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Guillory 540 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Distinguished State v. Hays 526 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Ray 521 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Vigee 518 So. 2d 501 La. 1988
State v. Robertson 516 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Wiley 513 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Whittaker (La.App.
State v. Williams 513 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. White 508 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Caldwell 504 So. 2d 853 La. 1987
State v. Evans 499 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Batista 496 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Valentine 496 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Alphonso 496 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Nicholas 491 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Kent 489 So. 2d 1354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1st Cir.1984), convictions and sentences reinstated, (La.
State v. Hernandez 488 So. 2d 972 La. 1986
: "Evidence is relevant which makes any fact indicating guilt or innocence more or less probable."
State v. Lopez 484 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. West 484 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Whittaker 479 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The Supreme Court disagreed, holding that the note was admissible and relevant, and that it established the “intent to murder.”