DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brogan, 457 So. 2d 1200.

42 citing documents.

  • State v. Richardson 241 So. 3d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 2 Cir.), writ denied , (La.
  • State v. Dominguez 148 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance L. Sinegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Sinegal 97 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. R. K. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. R.K. 64 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Quentin Truehill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. TRUEHILL 38 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Moss 10 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State in the Interest of J. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Creamer 980 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Larry Allen Creamer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. McKinsey 779 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 1984), writ denied (La.
  • State v. Jones 773 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    3d Cir. 7/25/84), writ denied
  • State v. Guillory 773 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    *805 3 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Clements 774 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    3rd Cir.1984), writ denied, State v. Morris, 98-236 (La.App.
  • State v. Rochon 733 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 1984), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Dorignac 729 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir.1984), writ denied, where the defendant appealed the trial court’s denial of his oral motion for a continuance of trial due to the absence of defense witnesses.
  • State v. Davis 726 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    3 Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Morris 719 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    3 Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Batiste 701 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4th Cir.1984), writ denied, this Court found that evidence of prior convictions elicited on cross-examination was necessary evidence for the State to prove that the defendant was a convicted felon.
  • State v. Horne 679 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    State v. Sepulvado, supra ; writ denied, (1984).
  • State v. Collins 677 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. James 670 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Sepulvado 655 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    2d Cir.), writ denied, (1984).
  • State v. Bancroft 620 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    He argues that his question was a writ den., wherein the court found that the trial court properly admitted expert opinions as to whether the defendant could distinguish right from wrong at the time of the offense.
  • State v. Thornton 611 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    4th Cir.1984), writ denied (La.
  • State v. Butler 563 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    2nd Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Johnson 558 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    2d Cir.), writ denied, and State v. Wade, supra.
  • State v. Cassell 540 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    3rd Cir. 1984), writ denied
  • State v. White 535 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    App.2d Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Baker 528 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • Burk v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR Co. 529 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    2d Cir.), writ denied, Gage v. St.
  • Schwamb v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. 516 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    2d Cir.), writ denied, Gage v. St.
  • State v. Prince 520 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Price 517 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    3rd Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Nolan 503 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Williams 499 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied, this court succinctly set forth the following requirements for the admissibility of a confession: Before the State may introduce a confession into evidence, it must be affirmatively shown that it was freely and voluntarily given and not adduced by threats, promises, or coercion.
  • State v. Martin 486 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    3 Cir.1984), writ denied, our Court reviewed the jurisprudence under La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Brown 478 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Lewis 478 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied