Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Raheem, 464 So. 2d 293.
- State v. Taylor 623 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
- State v. Garner 621 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
-
State v. Hutchinson
620 So. 2d 1205
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
-
State v. Moreno
619 So. 2d 62
La. 1993
5th Cir. 1991); (La.App.
- State v. Hill 618 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Chirlow 617 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
-
State v. Diaz-Rubio
615 So. 2d 1124
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1969); State v. Chirlow, ___ So.2d___ (La.App.
- State v. Carey 609 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
-
State v. Powell
598 So. 2d 454
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 , 103 S.Ct.
- State v. Francise 597 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- State v. Moreno 592 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
State v. Brady
585 So. 2d 524
La. 1991
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967)
- State v. Rack 585 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Henderson 571 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
State v. Desdunes
576 So. 2d 520
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
However, : "An arrest occurs when the circumstances indicate an intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than at the precise time an officer tells an accused he is under arrest."
- State v. Foley 570 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- State v. Kennedy 569 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
State v. Williams
567 So. 2d 755
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
See also State v. Tomasetti, supra
- State v. Davis 564 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
-
State v. Broussard
560 So. 2d 694
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
- State v. Rodriguez 554 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- State v. Davis 558 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
-
State v. Albert
553 So. 2d 967
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
2041, 2043 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); (La.
-
State v. DeBlanc
549 So. 2d 1287
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
-
State v. Tyler
548 So. 2d 24
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
art. 213(3) states, “A peace officer may, without a warrant, arrest a person when: The peace officer has reasonable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed an offense, although not in the presence of the officer....” Additionally, noted that Probable cause to arrest without a warrant exists when the facts and circumstances known to the arresting officer and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing th
- State v. Gervais 546 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- State v. Gervais 546 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Lee 545 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
-
State v. Rosell
544 So. 2d 1296
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
However, “An arrest occurs when the circumstances indicate an intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than at the precise time an officer tells an accused he is under arrest.” Id.
-
State v. Gamboa
543 So. 2d 1129
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
- State v. Roebuck 543 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Jarmon 543 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Dennis
540 So. 2d 550
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “An arrest occurs when the circumstances indicate an intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than at the precise time an officer tells an accused he is under ar-rest_” (citations omitted).
- State v. Bordelon 538 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Dickerson 538 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- State v. Hargrove 535 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Golmon 536 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Keno 534 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Roebuck 530 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
-
State v. Nebar
529 So. 2d 117
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
However, : “An arrest occurs when the circumstances indicate an intent to effect an extended restraint on the liberty of the accused, rather than at the precise time an oficer tells an accused he is under arrest.” Id.
-
State v. Porterfield
524 So. 2d 1363
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
-
State v. Bunnell
517 So. 2d 439
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
: One of the specifically established exceptions to the requirements of both a warrant and probable cause is a search conducted pursuant to consent.
- State v. Guidry 520 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Geraci 518 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
- State v. Trent 517 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Johnson 513 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
Miller v. East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Dept.
511 So. 2d 446
La. 1987
223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964)
- State v. Brown 507 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Domingue 507 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Harris 506 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987