Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hogan, 480 So. 2d 288.
- State v. Higginbotham 541 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Doby 540 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Sanders 539 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Chavez 540 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Collins 540 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Davis 537 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Drummer 537 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Hargrove 535 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Hargrove 535 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Lewis 535 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. White 535 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Wright 535 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Hudgins 519 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Herrington 512 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Roye 501 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Wilder 499 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Rodriguez 499 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- State v. Veal 490 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
State v. Moore
488 So. 2d 987
La. 1986
19 defendant had actual pretrial knowledge of the state’s intention to prove firearm use.
-
State v. Shows
488 So. 2d 992
La. 1986
[17] also held that the defendant had actual pretrial knowledge of the state's intention to prove firearm use and therefore there was no particular prejudice.
-
State v. Smith
487 So. 2d 549
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
the court queried whether C.Cr.P.
- State v. Quraan 487 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
- State v. Kennedy 480 So. 2d 299 La. 1985
-
State v. Blache
480 So. 2d 304
La. 1985
NOTES [1] ; ; ; ; ; ; , in which opinions are being handed down this day.
- State v. Barberousse 480 So. 2d 273 La. 1985
- State v. Delcambre 480 So. 2d 294 La. 1985
- State v. Harris 480 So. 2d 281 La. 1985
-
State v. Street
480 So. 2d 309
La. 1985
The other cases include: ; ; ; ; ; ; .