Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Taylor, 463 So. 2d 1274.

33 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Matthew L. Magrini La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 5/29/13), (-1275 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Chad M. Vidrine La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
cause[d] the death of a human being.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. David Leger La. 2019
Acts 662, et al.) (emphasis added).7 (La.
State v. Leger 236 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Louis-Juste 201 So. 3d 308 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Dock, 49,784 (La.App.2d Cir.6/3/15), .
State v. Dock 167 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Beene 164 So. 3d 299 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Watts 168 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Dickinson, 08-0558 (La.App.
State v. Lewis 147 So. 3d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Kenny 116 So. 3d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hamdan 112 So. 3d 812 La. 2013
State ex rel. R.V. 82 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The purpose of the vehicular homicide statute is to “curb traffic fatalities caused by the consumption of alcohol.”
State v. Dickinson 5 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Bellow 993 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Price 952 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Gourdine 946 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Thomas 938 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that, under the vehicular homicide statute, "the [S]tate .
State of Louisiana v. Sherry S. Bailey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
As another circuit has explained: the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that, under the vehicular homicide statute, “the state .
State v. Bailey 905 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
As another circuit has explained: the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that, under the vehicular homicide statute, "the state .
State v. Cedars 832 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Bradford 700 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Gibson 693 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
State v. Trahan 637 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that, under the vehicular homicide statute, "the state ...
State v. Archer 619 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the Supreme Court concluded that under the vehicular homicide statute, "the state ...
State v. Ristom 607 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Were the result otherwise, the driver could effectively defeat the state’s efforts to conduct a prompt test by requesting that he be given the opportunity to consult a lawyer.” (emphasis added) : “[U]nder the vehicular homicide statute, the state, in order to convict, must prove that an offender’s unlawful blood alcohol concentration combined with his operation of a vehicle to cause the death of a human being.” (Emphasis added.)
State v. Ritchie 590 So. 2d 1139 La. 1991
State v. Copes 566 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
in support of his contention that the state failed to prove one of the essential elements of the crime.
State v. Honeyman 565 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Kalathakis 563 So. 2d 228 La. 1990
State v. Adams 525 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Phillips 514 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Pearson 513 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
in support of this argument.