Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gentry, 462 So. 2d 624.
- State of Louisiana v. James D. Flemones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
- State v. Common 78 So. 3d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- State v. Griffin 17 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Ruiz 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
-
State v. Dudley
984 So. 2d 11
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Odom, 02-2698, p. 6 (La.App.
- State v. Odom 861 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
State v. Jackson
809 So. 2d 198
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
5th Cir.1984) affirmed, (La.
-
State v. Lee
778 So. 2d 656
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
205 , 107 L.Ed.2d 159 (1989)
- State v. Davis 672 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- State v. Gibson 628 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Fisher 628 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
State v. West
617 So. 2d 1384
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
defendant argued that the trial judge erred in allowing the prosecution two continuances.
- State v. Chatman 599 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
State v. Roberts
569 So. 2d 671
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
1610 , 75 L.Ed.2d 610 (1983); (La.
-
State v. Revere
572 So. 2d 117
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-629 (La.1985); (La.App.
-
Allen v. State Bd. of Dentistry
543 So. 2d 908
La. 1989
see also Jenkins, The Declaration of Rights, 21 Loyola (La.)
- State v. Parker 536 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
Allen v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry
531 So. 2d 787
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
1652 , 80 L.Ed.2d 85 (1984)
-
State v. Jones
526 So. 2d 1374
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
we further noted that the rule requiring the suppression of evidence illegally seized was intended to restrain governmental authorities, not private individuals.
- State v. Seay 521 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
-
State v. Sanchez
516 So. 2d 415
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
and cases cited therein.
- State v. Morris 508 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
State v. McCullough
503 So. 2d 1194
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Williams; ” the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that “...
- State v. Kraft 501 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
- State v. Savoy 501 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
- State v. Cann 494 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
State v. Coleman
466 So. 2d 68
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
because a routine search of a parcel by a common carrier was found reasonable.