Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tatum, 466 So. 2d 29.
-
State v. Gordon
646 So. 2d 1005
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
-
State v. Gordon
646 So. 2d 995
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
-
State v. St. Martin
644 So. 2d 773
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
-
State v. Scull
639 So. 2d 1239
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); (La.App.
- State v. Burton 640 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
-
State v. Alexander
632 So. 2d 853
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970)
-
State v. Lampton
631 So. 2d 523
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); (La.
-
State v. Tate
623 So. 2d 908
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970)
-
State v. Williams
619 So. 2d 650
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970)
-
State v. Thompson
617 So. 2d 956
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); (La.App.
-
State v. Silguero
616 So. 2d 1346
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
-
State v. Johnson
617 So. 2d 18
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970)
- State v. Davis 612 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
-
State v. Williams
605 So. 2d 716
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
-
State v. DeGruy
602 So. 2d 134
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); (La.App.
-
State v. Charles
602 So. 2d 15
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
- State v. Harmon 594 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
-
State v. Wells
593 So. 2d 465
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 *469 (1973); (La.
-
State v. Brady
585 So. 2d 524
La. 1991
1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970)
-
Johns v. Libbey Glass
557 So. 2d 1109
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
and a long line of jurisprudence.
-
State v. Rawls
552 So. 2d 764
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
-
State v. Tillman
545 So. 2d 1138
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
We are satisfied that the search was justified by the “automobile exception”
-
State v. Thompson
543 So. 2d 1077
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982)
- State v. Roebuck 543 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Dickerson 538 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- State v. Rosales 537 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
-
State v. Madison
535 So. 2d 1024
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed this exception: For constitutional purposes, there is no difference between on the one hand, seizing and holding a car before presenting the probable cause issue to a magistrate and on the other hand carrying out an immediate search without a warrant.
-
State v. Loera
530 So. 2d 1271
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
and cases cited therein.
-
State v. Duncan
527 So. 2d 387
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); (La.
-
State v. Wilson
520 So. 2d 864
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
the court discussed the automobile exception to the warrant requirement: “The ‘automobile exception’ has recently been upheld in U.S. v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 , 102 S.Ct.
- State v. Harris 506 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Bracken 506 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
-
State v. Colvin
494 So. 2d 1357
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
The Louisiana Supreme Court succinctly set forth the doctrine of the "automobile exception" : The "automobile exception" has recently been upheld in U.S. v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 , 102 S.Ct.
-
State v. Cathey
493 So. 2d 842
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970); (La.