Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tatum, 466 So. 2d 29.

134 citing documents.

  • State v. Gordon 646 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
  • State v. Gordon 646 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
  • State v. St. Martin 644 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
  • State v. Scull 639 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); (La.App.
  • State v. Burton 640 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Alexander 632 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970)
  • State v. Lampton 631 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); (La.
  • State v. Tate 623 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970)
  • State v. Williams 619 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970)
  • State v. Thompson 617 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); (La.App.
  • State v. Silguero 616 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
  • State v. Johnson 617 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970)
  • State v. Davis 612 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Williams 605 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
  • State v. DeGruy 602 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); (La.App.
  • State v. Charles 602 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
  • State v. Harmon 594 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Wells 593 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 *469 (1973); (La.
  • State v. Brady 585 So. 2d 524 La. 1991
    1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970)
  • Johns v. Libbey Glass 557 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    and a long line of jurisprudence.
  • State v. Rawls 552 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
  • State v. Tillman 545 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    We are satisfied that the search was justified by the “automobile exception”
  • State v. Thompson 543 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982)
  • State v. Roebuck 543 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Dickerson 538 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Rosales 537 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Madison 535 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed this exception: For constitutional purposes, there is no difference between on the one hand, seizing and holding a car before presenting the probable cause issue to a magistrate and on the other hand carrying out an immediate search without a warrant.
  • State v. Loera 530 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Duncan 527 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    2157 , 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982); (La.
  • State v. Wilson 520 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    the court discussed the automobile exception to the warrant requirement: “The ‘automobile exception’ has recently been upheld in U.S. v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 , 102 S.Ct.
  • State v. Harris 506 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Bracken 506 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Colvin 494 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    The Louisiana Supreme Court succinctly set forth the doctrine of the "automobile exception" : The "automobile exception" has recently been upheld in U.S. v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 , 102 S.Ct.
  • State v. Cathey 493 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    1969 , 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970); (La.