DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Terry, 458 So. 2d 97.

14 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Corey Miller La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
    art. 927 provides, in part: “An answer is required only when a claim upon which relief could be granted has been stated.” Given that relator’s APCR was denied outright by the district court, it does not appear an answer from the State was warranted, which in any case, would be to “afford the State an opportunity to be heard.” (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kee Food, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
  • State ex rel. Weldon v. State 201 So. 3d 885 La. 2016
  • State v. Stewart 176 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    App. 4 Cir, 5/23/12), , n. 2 (La.
  • State v. Diggins 153 So. 3d 1000 La. 2014
    946 , (1972) (“[i]n the absence of timely application for supervisory review staying such ruling, [the order granting a new trial] became final and was no longer subject to revision or reversal by the trial court which had rendered it”); (“[t]his Court has consistently held that ‘a trial court’s vacation of a conviction, even if beyond its authority, effectively and conclusively invalidates the verdict thus invalidated’”) ( State v. Oglesby, 164 La.
  • State v. Williams 95 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    A writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum is defined as " '[a] writ which issues when it is necessary to remove a prisoner in order to prosecute in the proper jurisdiction wherein the fact was committed.’ ” (quoting Black's Law Dictionary 837 (4th ed.1968))
  • State of Louisiana v. Randolph Matthieu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Matthieu 992 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Sinclair v. Kennedy 701 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Readoux 614 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    art. 927 the trial judge is not required to order the district attorney to file an answer before summarily disposing of a claim.
  • Harrison v. Norris 569 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Williams 505 So. 2d 1133 La. 1987
  • State Ex Rel. Bartie v. State 501 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    of 1974, art. I, § 21 and art. V, § 2
  • State v. Pemberton 478 So. 2d 1217 La. 1985
    the trial court ruled that a vacated conviction cannot be reinstated in the absence of a timely application for review by the district attorney.