Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Lasseigne, 488 So. 2d 1303.

14 citing documents.

Succession of Marie Therese Comeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3d Cir. 1973); for the assertion of forced heirship rights, (La.App.
In the Matter of the Succession of Marilyn Ann Barbier La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Succession of Malcom Lamar Murray La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3d Cir.1973); for the assertion of forced heirship rights, (La.App.
Succession of Teresa Salazar Rivera La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
In Succession of Lasseigne, the court found no proper cause was shown to reopen succession, specifically noting that “[n]o creditor was appearing to demand payment of a debt.” (La.
Succession of DiLeo 90 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Thus, when a son who had joined in a judgment of possession in a testate succession which did not recognize his forced heirship rights (which would have increased his share of property) sought to have such rights recognized by reopening the succession and amending the judgment, the court found no “proper cause.” (La.App.
In Re Successions of Gurtner 982 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Prine v. Prine 793 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Succession of Chatelain 788 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Succession of Williams 738 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Succession of Villarrubia 680 So. 2d 1147 La. 1996
3d Cir. 1973); for the assertion of forced heirship rights, (La.App.
Succession of Muse v. Rogers 672 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Estate of Sylvester 631 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
3d Cir.1973); for the assertion of forced heirship rights, (La.
Succession of McCarthy 583 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Succession of Lasseigne 494 So. 2d 327 La. 1986
Prior report: La.App., .