DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc., 490 So. 2d 1165.

19 citing documents.

  • Dow v. Chalmette Restaurant, Ltd. 193 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    We also recognize earlier decisions requiring the' filing of a timely exception of prematurity in workers’ • compensation cases filed in the district courts: See, , 1014-15 .(La.1988); Rich v. Geosource Wireline Servs., Inc., (La.App.
  • Dufrene v. VIDEO CO-OP, LA. WORKERS'COMP. 843 So. 2d 1066 La. 2003
    Rich v. Geosource Wireline Servs., Inc., (La.App.
  • Williamson v. CIGNA/INSURANCE CO. 576 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Jones v. Hartford Ins. Co. 560 So. 2d 442 La. 1990
    4th Cir.1987); Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc., (failure to obtain recommendation prior to bringing action to modify); Watson v. Amite Milling Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Moore v. Roemer 560 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    3d Cir.1986); Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc., (La.
  • Explained Green v. Continental Ins. Co. 539 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    In Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Goudeau v. Gray & Co. 527 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    For a thorough analysis of the interplay of the pertinent statutes, we direct attention to Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc.
  • Nichols v. Mid-American Van Line 522 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Turner v. Maryland Cas. Co. 518 So. 2d 1011 La. 1988
    3d Cir.1986); Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Clay v. J.P. Lapeyrouse, Inc. 517 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    *1109 After the trial court rendered judgment in the present case this court had occasion to explain the mechanics of the new claims resolution procedures of the 1983 Worker’s Compensation Act in the case of Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Suttle v. Roadway Express, Inc. 511 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    The Third Circuit soon rejected the approach it had taken in Henry in the case of Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Demery v. Dupree 511 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2d Cir.1987), which followed the Third Circuit's analysis in Rich v. Geosource Wireline, Inc., (La.App.
  • In re Estate of Williams 511 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    We agree with the interpretation of these provisions found in Rich v. Geo-source Wireline Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Moody v. K & B EQUIPMENT CO. 508 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    3rd Cir.1986); Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc.
  • Jakob v. Courtney Construction Co. of Alexandria 507 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    We followed this interpretation in Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Bailey v. Pacific Marine Ins. Co. 509 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Watson v. Amite Mill. Co., Inc. 504 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    More importantly, our brothers of the Third Circuit in Rich v. Geosource Wireline Serv., Inc., (La.App.
  • Brignac v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 496 So. 2d 1306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    This identical issue has been before us in Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc., (La.App.
  • Arthur v. Union Underwear Co., Inc. 492 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    [4] This Court recently decided the case of Rich v. Geosource Wireline Services, Inc., (La.App.