Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Michaleski v. Western Preferred Cas. Co., 472 So. 2d 18.

49 citing documents.

Faith Miller, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, Jeremy Strahin, Jr. Versus Morteza Shamsnia, Republic Fire … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Karen Sue Thibodeaux v. Geico Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Ms. Thibodeaux’s which preceded the supreme court’s opinion in Orgeron, as relevant to an analysis of whether the accident off work premises was within the course and scope of Ms. Boutte’s employment.
Thibodeaux v. GEICO Cas. Co. 249 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Ms. Thibodeaux's counsel cited the case of Michaleski v. Western Preferred Casualty Co ., which preceded the supreme court's opinion in Orgeron, as relevant to an analysis of whether the accident off work premises was within the course and scope of Ms. Boutte's employment.
Johnson v. Transit Mgmt. of Se. La., Inc. 239 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Sharp v. United Fire & Indemnity Co. 185 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Keith William MacKmer v. the Estate of Frank Angelle, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
2 Cir.1990), writ denied, (); Hughes v. Gearhart Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Mackmer v. Estate of Angelle 155 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2 Cir.1990), writ denied, ( (La.
Black v. Johnson 137 So. 3d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Distinguished White v. Frederick 17 So. 3d 1016 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
which involved an oil company employee who had an auto accident while returning to the work place from a necessary trip to eat during a “seven days on” employment period.
McLin v. Industrial Specialty Contractors 851 So. 2d 1135 La. 2003
2 Cir.1990), writ denied, (); Hughes v. Gearhart Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Fortenberry v. CR Bard, Inc. 830 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Johnson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 776 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Johnson v. Templeton 768 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Co., Hill v. West American Ins.
Freeman v. Hutson 738 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Lorraine v. Nolty J. Theriot, Inc. 729 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
see Brown, 704 So.2d at 10 .
Keith v. Gelco Corp. 705 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Mundy v. Department of Health and Human Resources, supra ; Tarver v. Energy Drilling Co., 26,233 (La.App.2d Cir. 10/26/94), .
Brown v. Coastal Const. & Engineering, Inc. 704 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
2nd Cir.1990), writ denied, Hughes v. Gearhart Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Bolton v. Tulane University of Louisiana 692 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Wilson v. City of Shreveport 682 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Tarver, supra, and Yates v. Naylor Industrial Services, Inc., (La.App.
Kennedy v. Martin Gas Transp. Co., Inc. 680 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Hughes v. Gearhart Industries, Inc., (La.App.
LeCroy v. Brand Scaffold Bldg., Inc. 672 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Wilson v. JEFFERSON PARISH OF PARKS & RECREATION 668 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Leflore v. Coburn 665 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Pappas v. Marine Spill Response Corp. 650 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Tarver v. Energy Drilling Co. 645 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Yates v. Naylor Industrial Services, Inc., 569 * Hughes v. Gearhart Industries, Inc., (La.
Hill v. West American Ins. Co. 635 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
White v. Frenkel 615 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
the Louisiana Supreme Court found an employee to be in the course and scope of his employment because the employer anticipated the necessity of the employee's journey.
McBride v. RF Kazimour Transp., Inc. 583 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Howard v. City of Alexandria 581 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
" our Supreme Court concluded that an employee who had left his employer's work site to get a meal was in the course and scope of his employment when an accident occurred while he was returning to the work site.
Yates v. Naylor Indus. Services, Inc. 569 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Hughes v. Gearhart Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Seay v. Wilson 569 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Hughes v. Gearhart Industries, Inc. 552 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Roger v. Dufrene 553 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
where an employee, Leger, was a motorman at an oilwell.
Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc. 551 So. 2d 1282 La. 1989
Guidry, supra ; Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co., (La.
Williams v. Regional Transit Authority 546 So. 2d 150 La. 1989
Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.
Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc. 543 So. 2d 472 La. 1989
Guidry, supra; Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.
Wall v. Brown & Root, Inc. 535 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
and the reasonable expectation of the employer that the employee would perform the act.” (citing Reed v. Home of Decor, Inc., (La.
Hebert v. Harbert International, Inc. 527 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
The jurisprudence also reveals that an accident occurs in the course of one’s employment “when it happens during the time of employment and at a place contemplated by the employment.” Reid, supra, at 996 ; Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc.
Austin v. Pascarelli 522 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Pierce v. Ellis 519 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Nelson v. Ronquillo 517 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
an oil field worker (a motorman) who worked “seven days on” and who was suffering from exhaustion drove with a co-worker about five or six miles to a McDonald’s and struck another vehicle head-on.
Bailes v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. 512 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Reid v. Gamb, Inc. 509 So. 2d 995 La. 1987
Co., Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill & Lbr.
LeBlanc v. Adams 510 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Better Properties, Inc., where the Court ruled that the employee in transit is in the course and scope of employment only when the employee is on a mission contemplated by the employer and for which the employee is to be compensated.
Toomer v. Cash 506 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
and the reasonable expectation of the employer that the employee would perform the act.” at 21.
Gordon v. Commercial Union Insurance Company 503 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
at 21, citing Reed v. House of Decor, Inc.
Smith v. Lewis 499 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Torres v. US Fidelity and Guar. Co. 499 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
at 21, citing Reed v. House of Decor, Inc.
Major Transports, Ltd. v. Courville 493 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986