DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., 475 So. 2d 756.

80 citing documents.

  • Barges Unlimited Inc. and Cornelius J. Tabor, Jr. v. Morgan City Stevendores, LLC, Babin Marine, LLC, Roland Shapley … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., ( La.
  • Theodule P. Noel, Jr. v. Theodule P. Noel, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    Assignment of error 3 “A conversion consists of an act in derogation of the plaintiff’s possessory rights, and any wrongful exercise or assumption of authority over another’s goods, depriving him of the possession, permanently or for an indefinite time, is a conversion.” Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (La.
  • Kelly Davis v. Steven Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    The trial court therefore erred as a matter of law in sustaining Steven’s exception of no cause of action.2 Attorney Fees “Attorney fees are not allowed in Louisiana except where authorized by statute or contract.” Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., Steven also argues that the trial court correctly sustained his exception because, contrary to the terms of the parties’ custody judgment, Kelly failed to pursue mediation before filing her motion to modify physical custody.
  • Tamekia Capers v. NorthPro Properties Management, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (La.
  • J. Peter Laborde, Jr. v. Pia Lyons Laborde La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (La.
  • Agrifund, LLC v. Radar Ridge Planting Co., Inc. and Thomas A. Dickerson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (La.
  • an Erny Girl, L. L.C. v. Bcno 4 L. L.C. 257 So. 3d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 5/26/10), , 405 ; quoting Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. , , 760 (La.
  • Fenner v. Schley 246 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. , (La.
  • Bihm v. Deca Systems, Inc. 226 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (La.
  • Everhome Mortgage Co. v. Lewis 207 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (La.
  • State v. Thompson 204 So. 3d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    "A conversion consists of an act in derogation of the plaintiff's possessory rights, and any wrongful exercise or assumption of authority over another’s goods, depriving him of the possession, permanently or for an indefinite time, is a conversion.” Quedly v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (La.
  • Lusich v. Capital One, ACP, LLC 198 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 2/26/14), ; see Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., *1277 (La.1985).
  • Dileo v. Horn 189 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., Unique Constr.
  • Kushi Healthcare, L.L.C. v. St. James Behavioral Health Hospital, Inc. 174 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    389, 408 , (1958); Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • The Bank of New York Mellon v. Whitney Blaine Smith, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    “[W]here property has been wrongfully seized through judicial process, damages for mental anguish and inconvenience due to the loss of use of the property are recoverable.” Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (citations omitted).
  • Bank of New York Mellon v. Smith 159 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    “[W]here property has been wrongfully seized through judicial process, damages for mental anguish and inconvenience due to the loss of use of the property are recoverable.” Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (citations omitted).
  • Melerine v. O'Connor 135 So. 3d 1198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. Smith 71 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    “[W]here property has been wrongfully seized through judicial process, damages for mental anguish and inconvenience due to the loss of use of the property are recoverable.” Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (citations omitted).
  • Birch v. Birch 55 So. 3d 796 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis Inc., Fuller v. XTO Energy Inc., 43,454 (La.App.
  • New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Foundation, Inc. v. Kirksey 40 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Generally, “conversion consists of an act in derogation of the plaintiffs possessory rights, and any wrongful exercise or assumption of authority over another’s goods, depriving him of the possession, permanently or for an indefinite time, is a conversion.” Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Fuller v. XTO Energy, Inc. 989 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2d Cir.05/09/07), , citing Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., a conversion consists of an act in derogation of a plaintiff's possessory rights, and any wrongful exercise or assumption of authority over another's goods, depriving him of the possession, permanently or for an indefinite time, is a conversion.
  • SOUTHERN CHIROPRACTIC AND SPORTS REHABILITATION CENTER, INC. v. Coleman 986 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (La.
  • Jefferson v. Crowell 956 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • II Fire Records, L.L.C. v. Clouden 951 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    In Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court defined the term “conversion.” The Supreme Court stated that “[a] conversion consists of an act in derogation of the plaintiffs possessory rights, and any wrongful exercise or assumption of authority over another’s goods, depriving him of the possession, permanently or for an ind
  • Alvarez v. Clasen 946 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., Aymond *183 v. State, Dept. of Revenue and Taxation, 951663 (La.App.
  • Richard v. Richard 930 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Henry Moreau and Geraldine Moreau v. Avoyelles Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., 16 Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son Loggers, 97-0110 (La.
  • Moreau v. Avoyelles Parish School Bd. 897 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son Loggers, 97-0110 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Crescent City Const., Inc. v. Camper 898 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Fg Bruschweiler (Antiques) v. Gba 860 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., Aymond v. State, Dept. of Revenue and Taxation, 951663 (La.App.
  • Stanley Richard Gordon v. Glen Hurlston, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Simpson v. Grimes 849 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    See Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., Broussard, Bolton, Halcomb & Vizzier v. Williams, 01-219 (La.App.
  • Lafourche Parish Council v. Breaux 845 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Brier Lake, Inc. v. Jones, 97-2413, p. 16 (La.4/14/98), ; Quealy *648 v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development v. Jones 827 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Wallace v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 821 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Rivet v. State, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), ; Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson, & Curtis, Inc.
  • Pelican Point Operations v. CHILDERS CO. 807 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    [7] See, e.g., Quealy *1178 v. Paine, Webber, Jackson, & Curtis, Inc.
  • Gibbs v. Harris 799 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    See Dual Drilling Company, supra, citing Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (La.
  • Perron v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury 798 So. 2d 67 La. 2001
    See, e.g., Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson, & Curtis, Inc., Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son Loggers, 97-0110 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Hamilton v. AAI VENTURES, LLC 768 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Singletary v. Fridley 762 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Scott v. Veal 736 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Dual Drilling Co. v. MILLS EQUIPMENT, INC. 721 So. 2d 853 La. 1998
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., Importsales, Inc. v. Lindeman, 231 La.
  • Reed v. Recard 744 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center 724 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Brier Lake, Inc. v. Jones 710 So. 2d 1054 La. 1998
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Bordelon v. Comeaux Furniture & Appliance, Inc. 701 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son Loggers 696 So. 2d 1382 La. 1997
    See Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., Hernandez v. Harson, 237 La.
  • Trahan v. Savage Industries, Inc. 692 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • Spear v. Tran 682 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.
  • DIAMOND B CONST. CO. v. City of Plaquemine 673 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Quealy v. Paine, Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc., (La.