Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite McDill v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 475 So. 2d 1085.
- Hackman v. Southern Farm Bureau Ins. Co. 629 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
-
Ridenour v. Wausau Ins. Co.
627 So. 2d 141
La. 1993
Co., we held that the "amount that is due would be a figure over which reasonable minds could not differ."
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Azhar
620 So. 2d 1158
La. 1993
Co., held that an insurer providing uninsured/underinsured coverage must promptly and unconditionally tender a reasonable amount to its insured.
- Harris v. Fontenot 606 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- Smith v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 603 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
-
Benoit v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.
602 So. 2d 53
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Plaintiffs argue that under McDill v. Utica Mutual Ins., Co., settlement negotiations do not constitute a defense to an untimely tender claim, thus the facts surrounding the negotiations including the amounts offered should not have been admitted.
- Wambsgans v. Liberty Lloyds Ins. Co. 595 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
-
United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Dugas
593 So. 2d 918
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
22:658 require an insurer to promptly and unconditionally tender a reasonable amount to its insured.
- Malbrough v. Wallace 594 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Haynes v. Shumake 582 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Wyble v. Allstate Ins. Co. 581 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- Barnes v. Thames 578 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Friedmann v. Landa 573 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Hardy v. Cumis Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Gulf Wide Towing, Inc. v. FE WRIGHT (UK) LTD.
554 So. 2d 1347
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Cantrelle Fence and Supply Company, (La.
- Comberrel v. Basford 550 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
-
Fuqua v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
548 So. 2d 310
La. 1989
this Court recognized the obligation of an uninsured motorist insurer, in cases of indisputable liability, to make a good faith unconditional tender in an amount over which reasonable minds could not differ or be subject to penalties and attorney’s fees for arbitrary failure to do so.
- Courmier-Trahan v. Service Cab Co., Inc. 546 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- Shepard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 545 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- Sharp v. Daigre 545 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Fuqua v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 542 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
-
Warner v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
543 So. 2d 511
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Co., Landry v. State Farm Ins.
- Guitreau v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Marcel v. Allstate Ins. Co. 536 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- River Road Const., Inc. v. Canal Indem. Co. 538 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Payne v. Old Hickory Ins. Co. 532 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
- Bauer v. White 532 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
Landry v. State Farm Ins. Co.
529 So. 2d 417
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Hart v. Allstate Insurance Company, supra ; Burton v. Foret, supra .
- Mader v. Babineaux 526 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- Belt v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co. 524 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
-
Cantrelle Fence & Supply v. Allstate Ins.
515 So. 2d 1074
La. 1987
the court outlined what must be proven in a claim for penalties and attorney's fees under R.S.
- Jackson v. Moore 517 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
-
Webb v. Goodley
512 So. 2d 527
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
[5] McDill v. Utica *532 Mutual Insurance Company
-
Rivett v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.
508 So. 2d 1356
La. 1987
S. McKenzie and H. Johnson, 15 Louisiana Civil Law TreatiseInsurance Law and Practice § 131 (1987 supp.).
- Bird v. Daniels 508 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- McHugh v. Chastant 503 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- Enterkin v. American Family Life Assurance Co. of Columbus 502 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Carlson v. Safeco Ins. Co. 499 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Aucoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 499 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Dairyland Ins. Co. 491 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
Stevenson v. Bolton Co., Inc.
484 So. 2d 678
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Co., Hart v. Allstate Ins.
- McGowan v. Ramey 484 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
Burton v. Foret
484 So. 2d 753
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Recently, stated: If the first three elements of the Hart test are satisfied and the insured has made a showing that the insurer will be liable for some general damages, the insurer must tender the reasonable amount which is due.
- Szwedt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 479 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985