DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Landry v. Board of Levee Com'rs of Orleans, 477 So. 2d 672.

25 citing documents.

  • Shelly Benoit v. City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 1987) and a recreational area within a populated city near a residential area of a 3 have not been immunized areas.
  • Benoit v. City of Lake Charles 907 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    5 Cir.1987) and a recreational area within a populated city near a residential area of a have not been immunized areas.
  • Richard v. Hall 874 So. 2d 131 La. 2004
  • Jacobs v. City of Bunkie 737 So. 2d 14 La. 1999
    of Levee Comm'rs of the Orleans Levee Dist., ("We note that the Legislature has addressed the matter of state liability in connection with things within its care and custody during the past legislative session by enacting 1985 Acts No. 454.
  • Ebarb v. Guinn Bros., Inc. 728 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    [5] a case which rejected a claim of R.S.
  • Deumite v. State 692 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    driveways and parking areas, located strategically between a state highway and a navigable bayou, a recreational area within a populated city, adjacent to a much-travelled roadway and "within a stone's throw" of a residential area of a city or town, a playground within the city limits of Kenner, Louisiana, (La.App.
  • Verdin v. LOUISIANA LAND AND EXPLOR. 693 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    1 Cir.1987); Keelen v. State, Dept. of Culture, Recreation and Tourism
  • Thomassie v. Savoie 581 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Monteville v. Terrebonne Par. Con. Gov't 567 So. 2d 1097 La. 1990
    207, 477 A.2d 36 (1984); (1985); Murchison, supra at 324; Malone, Louisiana Legislation of 1964: A Symposium-Torts, 25 La.L.Rev.
  • Socorro v. Orleans Levee Bd. 561 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    rendered seven months after Keelen , the court again addressed the applicability of the immunity statutes to an injury occurring in an area along the New Orleans lakefront under the control of the Levee Board: In Keelen , with respect to premises we determined that the Legislature by these statutes intended
  • Boudoin v. City of Kenner 556 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    Because the accident at issue in the case before us happened on January 15, 1986, the above statute is applicable, (La.
  • Ratcliff v. Town of Mandeville 551 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    the Court found said immunity to be inapplicable as the boat dock in this case is located in a recreational area within a populated city, adjacent to a frequently traveled road, and within a stone's throw of a residential area.
  • Cheneau ex rel. Sanders v. Apostolic Outreach Center 529 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Ratcliff, supra; Landry v. Board v. Levee Comm’rs of Orleans
  • Sutter v. Audubon Park Commission 533 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Several months after deciding Keelen , (La.
  • Adams v. State 525 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    4th Cir.1985), reversed on other grounds, (La.App.
  • Stuart v. City of Morgan City 504 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    9:2791 and 2795 do not apply to the place where the accident occurred because it is a noncommercial, man-made, fenced-in, shell beach with parking lot with a cement and sandbag ledge located a few blocks from a densely populated city limits (Morgan City), and Keelen v. State, Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism
  • Ratcliff v. Town of Mandeville 502 So. 2d 566 La. 1987
    where this court held that the levee board and the State of Louisiana were not immune from liability under R.S.
  • Herbert v. City of Kenner 501 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    of Levee Comm'r of Orleans Levee Dist., Justice Calogero quoted the Keelen case and added: In Keelen, with respect to premises we determined that the Legislature by these statutes intended to confer immunity only upon owners of undeveloped, non-residential, rural or semi-rural land areas.
  • Landry v. State 495 So. 2d 1284 La. 1986
    In a previous decision, at we reversed the Court of Appeal, and held R.S.
  • Ratcliff v. Town of Mandeville 491 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Acts 1975, No. 615, §§ 2-5 [2]
  • Van Pelt v. Morgan City Power Boat Ass'n, Inc. 489 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Because of their similarity, we will discuss the statutes together, as the Supreme Court did in Keelen v. State, Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism
  • Holder v. Louisiana Parks Service, Inc. 493 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    the Supreme Court found that "unless the premises on which a plaintiff's activities occur are within the purview of the statutes, the activities of the victim and the condition or instrumentality causing the injury are irrelevant."
  • Brooks v. City of Lake Charles 488 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • Wadsworth v. Town of Berwick 484 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    At the time the learned trial judge rendered his decision, our Supreme Court had not yet rendered its opinion in either Keelen v. State of Louisiana, Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism
  • Landry v. State 483 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986