Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc., 481 So. 2d 122.
-
Lyman L. Smith v. Packaging Corporation of America
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Inc., Starks v. Universal Life Ins.
-
Duane G. Tower v. Conocophillips Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Inc., Starks v. Universal Life Ins.
-
Knight v. Imperial Trading Co.
274 So. 3d 807
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc. , , 124 (La.
-
Eugene-Robinson v. E. Jefferson Gen. Hosp.
237 So. 3d 93
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc. , , 124 (La.
-
Tolley v. James Construction Group, LLC
202 So. 3d 1044
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4/10/95), ; quoting Swearingen v. Air Products & Chem., Inc., and Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., 229 La.
-
Gay v. Georgia-Pacific
184 So. 3d 39
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Swe aringen v. Air Products & Chem., Inc.
-
Slocum v. Northlake Driveline
117 So. 3d 171
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc.
-
Pitre v. Buddy's Seafood
102 So. 3d 815
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc.
-
Tommy Manucy v. Joe Mancuy Racing
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
& Chem., Inc., Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., 229 La.
-
Manucy v. Joe Manucy Racing
34 So. 3d 994
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
& Chem., Inc., ; Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., 229 La.
-
Darryl Hinnard v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
& Chem., Inc., Bolden v. Georgia Casualty & Sur.
-
Warren v. ACTION OIL RECOVERY
944 So. 2d 615
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc.
-
Winford v. Conerly Corp.
897 So. 2d 560
La. 2005
& Chem., Inc., ; Wallace v. Remington Rand, Inc., 229 La.
-
Boudreaux v. Angelo Iafrate Const.
895 So. 2d 596
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chem., Inc.
-
Brenda White v. Phoenix Pharmacy
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
& Chem., Inc., Bolden v. Georgia Casualty & Sur.
-
White v. Phoenix Pharmacy
870 So. 2d 592
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
& Chem., Inc., Bolden v. Georgia Casualty & Sur.
-
Boudreaux v. Angelo Iafrate Const.
848 So. 2d 3
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc.
-
Desselle v. Dresser Indus. Valve
689 So. 2d 549
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
& Chem., Inc., Bolden v. Georgia Casualty & Sur.
-
Smith v. Fruehauf Trailer Operations
666 So. 2d 1246
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Sevin, supra; Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical Inc., Duncan v. State, through DOTD, (La.App.
-
Starks v. Universal Life Ins. Co.
666 So. 2d 387
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc.
-
Stevens v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
663 So. 2d 543
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc.
-
Sevin v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
652 So. 2d 1323
La. 1995
& Chem., Inc., Bolden v. Georgia Casualty & Sur.
-
Dempster v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
643 So. 2d 1316
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
See: Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc.
-
Bissic v. Hart Associates
643 So. 2d 261
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc., Lynn v. Berg Mechanical, Inc., (La.
-
Glascock v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
635 So. 2d 474
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc., (La.
-
Davis v. United General Ins. Co.
631 So. 2d 572
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Swearingen v. Air Products and Chemical, Inc.
-
Munch v. Lafitte Barataria Crown Point Fire Department
619 So. 2d 101
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
‘‘[D]isability marks the time from which it is clear that the employee is no longer able to perform the duties of his employment in a satisfactory manner.” Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc.
-
Robicheaux v. Lafayette OB/GYN Clinic
607 So. 2d 990
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
220.” Defendants cite Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc., to support their contention.
-
Ponville v. Travelers Insurance Co.
591 So. 2d 421
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Disability ‘marks the time from which it is clear that the employee is no longer able to perform the duties of his employment in a satisfactory manner.’ Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc., citing Mottet v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., 220 La.
-
Lynn v. Berg Mechanical, Inc.
582 So. 2d 902
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Even if we were to agree that Lynn's injuries had caused a developing disability that later manifested itself, as recognized in Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc., the statute requires that a claim for developing disability be instituted within two years from the date of the accident that causes the developing disability.
-
Holmes v. Baton Rouge Water Works Co.
558 So. 2d 629
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc., (La.
-
Melancon v. Hartford Ins. Co.
545 So. 2d 557
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc., citing Mottet v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., 220 La.
-
Latino v. Binswanger Glass Co.
532 So. 2d 960
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
The factual situation in Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc., is closely analogous to the present.
-
Bernard v. WOODROW WILSON CONST. CO., INC.
526 So. 2d 1248
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc.
-
Franz v. New Orleans Breakers, Ltd. Partnership
515 So. 2d 1120
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc.
-
Olson v. Cardinal Wireline Specialist
502 So. 2d 164
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
More recently, in Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc., the court stated: “...
-
Davis v. Oilfield Scrap & Equipment Co.
482 So. 2d 970
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
NOTES [1] See Swearingen v. Air Products & Chemical, Inc., wherein our Supreme Court elucidates upon the subject of peremption under La.R.S.