Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rayne State Bank & Trust Co. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co., 483 So. 2d 987.

65 citing documents.

Jenkins v. Starns 85 So. 3d 612 La. 2012
Allied Shipyard, Inc. v. Edgett 868 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co., the majority also noted the Supreme Court said: “In Louisiana prescription does not begin to run until damage is sustained.
Stokes v. Oster Development, Inc. 807 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Co., citing Jones v. Texas & Pacific Ry.
Hendrick v. ABC Ins. Co. 787 So. 2d 283 La. 2001
Hotard v. Banuchi 784 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Landry v. BLAISE, INCORPORATED 774 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Guitreau v. Kucharchuk 763 So. 2d 575 La. 2000
Distinguished Bopp Salon Services, Inc. v. Carraway 714 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
On the other hand, and that Bopp sustained damages when it was forced to defend Causey’s nullity action that was commenced in March 1995.
Wang v. Broussard 708 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Abrams v. Herbert, 590 So.2d at 1295 .
Parker v. Dr. X 704 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court said: Mere notice of a wrongful act will not suffice to commence the running of the prescriptive period.
Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere and Denegre, LLP v. Homestead Ins. Co. 700 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Co., but the point at which the one-year prescriptive period commenced was not otherwise limited by statute.
Gassen v. East Jefferson General Hosp. 687 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court said: Mere notice of a wrongful act will not suffice to commence the running of the prescriptive period.
Phillip v. Home Ins. Co. 671 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Co., Abbott & Meeks v. de la Vergne, 94-0263 (La.App.
Schlesinger v. Herzog 672 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
National Council on Compensation Ins. v. QUIXX TEMPORARY SERVICES INC. 665 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Co., or Braud v. New England Ins.
Explained Edelman v. New Orleans Saints 656 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Vaughn v. Slaughter 653 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
See also Rayne State Bank & and Cherokee Restaurant, (La.App.
Jeme, Inc. v. Gold Coast Carpets, Inc. 643 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Co., the creditor did not know of the harm caused by the establishment and recordation of the trust until after October 3, 1990, the date of a sheriffs sale establishing that a balance was owed on the principal obligation.
Lirette v. Roe 631 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Co., Jones v. Texas & P. Ry.
PREMIER BANK, NAT. ASS'N v. Stout 627 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Citing Rayne State Bank & the majority also noted the Supreme Court said: "In Louisiana prescription does not begin to run until damage is sustained.
FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN ASS'N OF LAKE CHARLES v. Jones 620 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
In Rayne State Bank & the Supreme Court explained: In Louisiana prescription does not begin to run until damage is sustained.
Reed v. City of Ville Platte 619 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Jure v. Barker 619 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Royal Fiberglass Pools, Inc. v. Cedars 614 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Cole v. Celotex Corp. 599 So. 2d 1058 La. 1992
Crier, 496 So.2d at 308 (citing Rayne State Bank & ); -65 (La.App.
Lima v. Schmidt 595 So. 2d 624 La. 1992
Relying on Rayne State Bank & the court of appeal found that the Limas sustained damage sufficient to state a cause of action against Schmidt in July 1985, when, by virtue of the notice of seizure, they obtained knowledge of Bank's mortgage.
Pointe Coupee Shell v. Mar-Len of La. 594 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc. 593 So. 2d 351 La. 1992
Co., Phelps v. Donaldson, 243 La.
Abrams v. Herbert 590 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Clulee v. Louisiana Materials Co., Inc. 590 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
U. Fire Ins., Barre v. St.
Baker v. Campbell 582 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Rayne State Bank & Cherokee Restaurant, (La.App.
Landmark Savings Bank v. Greenwald 582 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Landmark Sav. Bank v. Greenwald 582 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Citizens Nat. Bank v. Gilsbar, Inc. 581 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
The Louisiana Supreme Court has previously dealt with the issue of prescription in a legal malpractice action in Rayne State Bank &amp
Lee v. New England Ins. Co. 579 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
App. 3d Cir.1985), writ granted, reversed in part on other grounds; (La.App.
McCray v. New England Ins. Co. 579 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Rayne State Bank & (La.
Allain v. First Guaranty Bank 577 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Braud v. New England Ins. Co. 576 So. 2d 466 La. 1991
Defendants filed an exception of prescription which the trial court sustained, to conclude that prescription began to accrue on April 30, 1985, the date the nullity suit was filed, and that the Braud's malpractice suit was untimely.
Rolene Corp. v. Trois Amis, Inc. 572 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Hannie v. Wall 569 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Rhoden v. Wegmann 569 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Olivier v. Poirier 563 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Co., the supreme court held that: Mere notice of a wrongful act will not suffice to commence the running of the prescriptive period.
Succession of Smith v. Kavanaugh, Pierson and Talley 565 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Braud v. New England Ins. Co. 562 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Edward J. Milligan, Jr., Ltd. v. Keele 558 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
The Oliver [Olivier ] case, as well as the case of Rayne State Bank & Trust Company v. National Union Fire Insurance Company, et al, support this Court’s conclusion that the one (1) year prescriptive period commenced running on or prior to January 16, 1985, the definitely ascertainable date of Mr. Milligan’s discontinued representation of Mr. Keele.” Accordingly, the trial court sustained plaintiff’s exception of prescription and dismiss
Montgomery v. Jack 556 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
3d Cir. 1985), writ granted, modified on appeal
Thomas v. State 545 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Norwood v. Fish 537 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Distinguished Newsom v. Boothe 524 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Co. v. Nat `I Union Fire Ins.
Law v. Mayeux 527 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988