Faustina Pipe Line Company v. Hebert
Also decided on this docket: La., September 20, 1985 474 So. 2d 1295
Faustina Pipe Line Company v. Hebert, 474 So. 2d 1295 (La. 1985).
Cited by
- Jeans v. Caraway 649 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Regard 567 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Walter 527 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Payne v. Country Pride Foods, Ltd. 525 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- Moran v. Aleman 521 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Mayet 521 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Jenkins v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 520 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Givens v. F.W. Woolworth Co. 508 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Jefferson v. Antee 502 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Montgomery 499 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Conner v. American Druggists Insurance Co. 495 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Opinion text
474 So.2d 1295 (1985) FAUSTINA PIPE LINE COMPANY v. John Austin HEBERT, Annabelle Hebert Sonnier, et al. FAUSTINA PIPE LINE COMPANY v. Percy HEBERT, et al. No. 85-C-1215. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 20, 1985. Denied. DENNIS, J., would grant the writ. BLANCHE, J., would grant the writ on the issue of severance damages. The mere existence of a pipeline absent any evidentiary support of damage will not support an award for severance damages. Furthermore, encasement costs of a pipeline under unplanned streets in an imaginary subdivision is speculative.