DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Miller v. Duthu, 474 So. 2d 1310.

19 citing documents.

  • McCartney v. McCartney 256 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir.), writ denied , (1985) ; Hannan v. Hannan , 1999-0842 (La.
  • Diane M. Sheridon, Born Richard v. Jonathan Sheridon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    4 Cir.), writ denied, (holding that the trial court did not err in failing to set the value of an asset at the amount testified to by the husband’s expert, who was the only expert to testify on value at trial, and instead setting the value at an amount between that testified to by the expert and that urged by the wife in her
  • Sheridon v. Sheridon 867 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    4 Cir.), writ denied, (holding that the trial court did not err in failing to set the value of an asset at the amount testified to by the husband's expert, who was the only expert to testify on value at trial, and instead setting the value at an amount between that testified to by the expert and that urged by the wife in her desc
  • Hannan v. Hannan 761 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4 Cir.), writ denied, (1985).
  • Sherrod v. Sherrod 709 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    4 Cir.1985), writ denied, the appellate court concluded that the trial court was correct in treating a particular retirement account as a present asset where the money in the retirement account could be withdrawn at any time and therefore was reducible to possession.
  • Ecroyd v. Ecroyd 682 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    4 Cir.), writ denied, where the court held that the trial court was not required to accept the value of an asset advanced by the only expert to testify.
  • Major v. Major 671 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Dunn v. Potomac Ins. Co. of Illinois 657 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Callender v. Callender 625 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    4th Cir.1985), writ denied
  • Kupperman & Co. v. Buffalo Insurance Co. 535 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    1st Cir.1985), writ denied
  • Bergquist v. Fernandez 535 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    1st Cir.1985), writ denied
  • D'Spain v. D'Spain 527 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • Rosinia v. Board of Trustees 526 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Harris v. First Assurance Life of America 526 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Fisher v. Morrison 519 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    1st Cir.), writ denied, appears the following: An insurance policy is a contract between the insured and the insurer and has the effect of law between the parties....
  • Poirier v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 517 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    1st Cir.1987); writ denied, (La.
  • Dietrich v. Travelers Ins. Co. 504 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    1st Cir.1985), writ denied, (La.
  • Terrebonne v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 491 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    1st Cir.1985), writ denied
  • Shields v. Pennsylvania General Ins. Co. 488 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    1st Cir.1985), writ denied, (1985).