Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hegre v. Hegre, 483 So. 2d 920.

16 citing documents.

Jennye Wrynn Baker Voyles v. James Thomas Voyles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Art. 112, as amended 1982 & 1986), emphasizes the authority of the court in this regard
Voyles v. Voyles 901 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Art. 112, as amended 1982 & 1986), emphasizes the authority of the court in this regard
McCarty v. McCarty 729 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Douthit v. Douthit 732 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Gardner v. Gardner 710 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
in support of her argument that the court cannot prospectively terminate alimo *1156 ny.
Wallace v. Wallace 708 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Thibodeaux v. Thibodeaux 668 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed a decision which had granted a divorced wife alimony for a period of one year.
Hackett v. Hackett 591 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Further, disapproved the imposition of a time limit for an award of post-divorce alimony, based on the difference between permanent periodic alimony and lump sum alimony as outlined in La.C.C.
Slayter v. Slayter 576 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Martin v. Martin 573 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
to support her argument that the trial court erred in imposing a termination date for her award of post-divorce alimony.
Cenac v. Cenac 538 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
the court looked at factors to be considered in setting the amount of alimony that the claiming spouse was entitled to.
Richard v. Richard 527 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
(5th Cir.1985) writ denied 464 So.
Cressend v. Cressend 514 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
However, we also recognize that any award of alimony and child support can always be vacated or modified when there is a
Lindner v. Lindner 506 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Teasdel v. Teasdel 493 So. 2d 1165 La. 1986
Lagars v. Lagars 491 So. 2d 5 La. 1986