Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite LaFleur v. John Deere Co., 491 So. 2d 624.

49 citing documents.

Tamla Pierre and Chris Taylor v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., and Gregory Abel La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 1 Cir. 5/30/14), ( (La.
Bradley Day & Tracey Day v. Elvis Dean Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
2/28/96), the supreme court explained the trial court’s role in determining the admissibility of surveillance video evidence: “The determination of whether motion pictures or video tapes are admissible is largely within the discretion of the trial court.”
Fie, LLC v. New Jax Condo Ass'n, Inc. 241 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Lafleur v. John Deere Co. , , 630 (La.
State in the Intrest of T. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
United States Fidelity & (La.App.
State ex rel. T.H. 140 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
United States Fidelity & (La.
Maldonado v. Kiewit Louisiana Co. 152 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that the court of appeal erred when it declined to review the issue of whether evidence should have been excluded on the grounds that defendants failed to object timely to presenting the evidence at trial.
Reeves v. Grove 72 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
eo did not help the jury clarify Ms. Reeves’ need for oral surgery, long-term psychiatric treatment, and she maintains that a depiction of her raised arm “does not un-tear her rotator cuff, thereby eliminating the need for expensive surgery.” “The determination of whether motion pictures or video tapes are admissible is largely within the discretion of the trial court.” Olivier v. LeJeune, 95-0053, p. 10 (La.2/28/96), .
Annie Mae Nunez v. Michael I. Tribe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Nunez v. Tribe 966 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Smith v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 846 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Precht v. Case Corp. 756 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
This issue was considered in Olivier v. LeJeune, 95-53, p. 8 (La.2/28/96); , and Orgeron v. Tri-State Road Boring, Inc., (La.
Kelly v. Riles 751 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Sartain 746 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
United States Fidelity & (La.App.
Ibieta v. Star Casino, Inc. 720 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Constans v. Choctaw Transport, Inc. 712 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Hi-Tower Concrete Pumping Service, Inc., (La.App.
State v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
United States Fidelity & (La.App.
Sanders v. Zeagler 686 So. 2d 819 La. 1997
Bolden v. Jeffrey's Steel Co., Inc. 684 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Lee v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 682 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Olivier v. LeJeune 668 So. 2d 347 La. 1996
Stonecipher v. Mitchell 655 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
See, Meador v. Toyota of Jefferson, Inc., Gary P. Graphia, Comment, Nonpecuniary Damages: A Guide to Damage Awards Under Louisiana Civil Code Article 1998, 50 La.L.Rev.
Olivier v. LeJeune 649 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Stephens v. Town of Jonesboro 642 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Pino v. Gauthier 633 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Frederick v. Woman's Hosp. of Acadiana 626 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
United States Fidelity & writs denied, , 137 (La.1991); Ashley v. Nissan *475 Motor Corp., -873 (La.
Young v. Ford Motor Co., Inc. 595 So. 2d 1123 La. 1992
The question here, whether mental anguish damages are recoverable in a redhibition action by a plaintiff who purchases a simply defective, and thus useless, product which does not cause personal injury
Malbrough v. Wallace 594 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
United States Fidelity & writs denied, , 137 (La.1991); -873 (La.
Hale Farms, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Company 580 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Young v. FORD MOTOR CO., INC. 574 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
i.e., "whether a new car purchase contract and breach thereof is governed by the new C.C.
US F&G v. Hi-Tower Concrete Pumping Service 574 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Johnston v. Norcondo 572 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
the court discussed the distinction between the "normal breach of contract not involving delictual conduct" and the breach of contract involving "delictual as well as contractual elements."
Klemetsen v. H & R Block, Inc. 569 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
( [La.1986] at p. 632 #4).
Gulf American Industries v. Airco Indus. Gases 573 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
3 Cir.1985), amended and affirmed
Blue v. Schoen 556 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Although a few subsequent cases attempted to modify the application of this principle
Richards v. Cousins 550 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Snoke v. M & M DODGE, INC. 546 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Miller v. Thompson 542 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Creger v. Robertson 542 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
the Supreme Court reaffirmed its Meador interpretation of Art. 1934(3), finding that "nonpecuniary damages are not allowed in a simple breach of contract case unless the contract has for its object `the gratification of some intellectual enjoyment....'" Lafleur, supra, at 630.
Alarcon v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 538 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
a farmer sought damages for his mental anguish as well as for his crop loss from the manufacturer of a defective grain *698 drill.
Jones v. Lingenfelder 537 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Burk v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR Co. 529 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Hostetler v. W. Gray & Co., Inc. 523 So. 2d 1359 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Meador v. Toyota of Jefferson, Inc., B & B (La.App.
Shepard v. Duhon 523 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Tide Craft, Inc. v. Red Ball Oxygen Co. 514 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Mini Togs Products, Inc. v. Wallace 513 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Robert v. Bayou Bernard Marine, Inc. 514 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
3 Cir.1985), writ granted, aff'd, amended and rendered
Toups v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc. 507 So. 2d 809 La. 1987
3 Cir.1985), writ granted
Morgan v. American Fire and Indem. Co. 506 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
art. 1934(3); Meador v. Toyota of Jefferson, Inc.
Joseph v. Ford Motor Co. 499 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by