DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gagnet v. Zummo, 487 So. 2d 721.

13 citing documents.

  • Kristy Bailey v. David R. Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    In a similar case, (La.App.
  • Bailey v. Leblanc 151 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In a similar case, (La.App.
  • Morris v. Flores 840 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    4th Cir.1983), in which a woman, who was approaching her third trimester of pregnancy when involved in an automobile accident, received $12,000 in general damages when she suffered knee and shoulder pain which could not be treated with medication due to her pregnancy, and experienced fear and anxiety about the baby's health during the remainder of her pregnancy; (La.
  • Futch v. Attwood 698 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    65 , 121 L.Ed.2d 32 (1992); (La.App.
  • American Motorist Ins. Co. v. American Rent-All, Inc. 617 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • Fannin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 594 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    QUANTUM The trial court made the following awards: In favor of Edwinna Fannin, wife of Elmer A. Duncan: Past lost wages $133,009.00 Future loss of earning capacity 449,023.00 Loss of love and affection 300,000.00 In favor of Marion Natkowski: Past lost wages $ 7,370.00 Loss of earning capacity 68,784.00 Pain and suffering/mental anguish 45,000.00 (5th Cir.1986), this Court stated: "In determining whether an award of damages is inadequate or excessive we must first inquire whether [trier of fact'
  • Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc. 560 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • Demarest v. Progressive American Ins. Co. 552 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    (5th Cir.1986) this Court stated: "In determining whether an award of damages is inadequate or excessive we must first inquire whether the jury's *1334 award for particular injuries and their effect upon the injured person was a clear abuse of the trier of fact's "much discretion."
  • Boehm v. French 548 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    App. 4 Cir.1985), writ denied (La.App.
  • Miller v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. 527 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • McMillan v. Bank of the South 514 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Hill v. Lamulle 506 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    We recently explained the test to be followed in determining the adequacy of a (La.App.
  • Bivalacqua v. Aube 493 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986