DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fryar v. Westside Habilitation Center, 479 So. 2d 883.

27 citing documents.

  • Puckett v. ADVANCE SPORTS, INC. 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1482 , 79 L.Ed.2d 804 (1984), (La.
  • New Inv. Properties, LLC v. ABC Ins. Co. 972 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Sparks, 614 So.2d at 293 ().
  • Fuller v. American Recreational Vehicles 801 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Office Dimensions-Louisiana
  • Escoto v. US Lending Corp. 675 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    in support of their position.
  • Sparks v. US Fidelity and Guar. Co. 614 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • McLean v. Smith 593 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held a corporate officer liable for breach of his `duty to see that the [corporation's] obligations were carried out,' stating: `An employee cannot shield himself behind a corporate wall when he is the officer responsible for the corporation's acts in a particular transaction.'
  • De Reyes v. Marine Mgt. and Consulting 586 So. 2d 103 La. 1991
    See Superior Supply Co. v. Associated Pipe & Supply Co., (La.
  • Fox v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. State Univ. 576 So. 2d 978 La. 1991
  • Riess v. Abshire 570 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    the Court discussed "minimum contacts" and personal jurisdiction: The basic due process requirement for jurisdiction over a person is minimum contacts with the forum state.
  • Guidry v. CAJUN RENTALS AND SERVICES 563 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • Sencore, Inc. v. Roes Iron Works 562 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    the Supreme Court held: An employee cannot shield himself behind a corporate wall when he is the officer responsible for the corporation’s acts in a particular transaction.
  • Fox v. Board of Supervisors 559 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    our Supreme Court set forth the constitutional due process considerations for the assertion of in personam jurisdiction: The basic due process requirement for jurisdiction over a person is minimum contacts with the forum state.
  • Gulf Wide Towing, Inc. v. FE WRIGHT (UK) LTD. 554 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    the Louisiana Supreme Court set out the requirements of due process for jurisdiction over a person as follows: The basic due process requirement for jurisdiction over a person is minimum contacts with the forum state....
  • Carter v. Estes 554 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    our Supreme Court noted the requirements for due process: The basic due process requirement for jurisdiction over a person is minimum contacts with the forum state.
  • Briley Marine Service, Inc. v. Toups 551 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    succinctly set forth the due process requirements for jurisdiction over the person as follows: The basic due process requirement for jurisdiction over a person is minimum contacts with the forum state.
  • Security Homestead Ass'n v. International Ins. Co. 546 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Criticized Chaney v. Godfrey 535 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    criticized in Morris, Developments in the Law 1985-1986—Business Associations, 47 La.L.Rev.
  • 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney 520 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • Drake v. Hammond Square 525 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    our Supreme Court noted the requirements for due process: The basic due process requirement for jurisdiction over a person is minimum contacts with the forum state.
  • Hemphill-Kunstler-Buhler, Auctioneers & Appraisers v. Davis Wholesale Electronics Supply Co. 516 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held a corporate officer liable for breach of his “duty to see that the [corporation’s] obligations were carried out,” stating: “An employee cannot shield himself behind a corporate wall when he is the officer responsible for the corporation’s acts in a particular transaction.” 4
  • Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Avco Corp. 513 So. 2d 1188 La. 1987
  • Gillespie v. Bynum 508 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    World Wide Volkswagen v. Woodson, supra
  • Bowman v. Weill Const. Co. 502 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • First State Bank of Warren v. Sterlington Bank 493 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • National Oil & Gas Co. of Florida v. Teel 493 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • McBead Drilling Co. v. Kremco, Ltd. 490 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    noted that Louisiana's Long Arm Statute was intended to encompass the maximum jurisdictional outreach allowable under the United States Constitution.
  • Duehring v. Vasquez 490 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    as follows: The basic due process requirement for jurisdiction over a person is minimum contacts with the forum state.