DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cassidy v. Cassidy, 477 So. 2d 84.

31 citing documents.

  • Tull v. Tull 704 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Simon v. Simon 696 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • Wascom v. Wascom 691 So. 2d 678 La. 1997
  • Lacoste v. Lacoste 665 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Unkel v. Unkel 651 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Crifasi v. Crifasi 650 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    The issue of whether alimony pendente lite should be terminated when a divorce becomes final
  • Wheelahan v. Wheelahan 644 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • Skannal v. Skannal 631 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • Herman v. Zatzkis 629 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Martin v. Martin 625 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Moody v. Moody 618 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Miguez v. Miguez 604 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • Dix v. Dix 587 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Nungesser v. Nungesser 558 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • Hardee v. Hardee 551 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Russell v. Russell 549 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that alimony pendente lite continues until a divorce becomes final: Alimony pendente lite arises from the obligation of one spouse to support the other during the pendency of the marriage, as set out in C.C.
  • Coleman v. Coleman 541 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    3d Cir.), overruled on other grounds
  • Napoli v. Napoli 543 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Williams v. Williams 541 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • Vassallo v. Vassallo 540 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • Nugent v. Nugent 533 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Moreover, to the procedural facts of this case, and we likewise find that case applicable.
  • Impastato v. Impastato 527 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    (5th Cir.1987) writ denied , 1149.
  • Olson v. Olson 519 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • Babin v. Babin 511 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    The appellant’s position is that clearly she was entitled to alimony pendente lite while the suit was on appeal, and earlier judgments.
  • Martinez v. Martinez 503 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • Cabral v. Cabral 503 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • Conner v. Conner 499 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    wherein the Supreme Court overruled Derbes and Whipple , holding that "[a]limony pendente lite should continue during the pendency of an appeal until the divorce judgment becomes definitive."
  • Palmer v. Palmer 488 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Remanded to the Court of Appeal to reconsider in light of Cassidy v. Cassidy, 85-CC-1114, .” With all due respect, we are once again forced to admit that we are confused and disconcerted by the Supreme Court’s course of action.
  • Andrew v. Andrew 486 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, held that alimony pendente lite should continue during the pendency of an appeal until the divorce judgment becomes definitive.
  • Gaidry v. Gaidry 481 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    for a different rule as concerns alimony pendente lite which must continue until final judgment on appeal.
  • Palmer v. Palmer 479 So. 2d 357 La. 1985
    Remanded to the Court of Appeal to reconsider in light of Cassidy v. Cassidy, 85-CC-1114, .