Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Felix v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co., 477 So. 2d 676.
- Mary Smith, individually and on behalf of concerned members of the Louisiana Association of the Deaf, Inc. v. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
- Jazz Casino Company, L.L.C. v. Cynthia Bridges, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Revenue 223 So. 3d 488 La. 2017
- Medical Review Panel of Williams v. Emsa Louisiana, Inc. 203 So. 3d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- Moore v. City of Monroe 147 So. 3d 288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
- Uletom Hewitt v. Lafayette Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- Hewitt v. Lafayette Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board 139 So. 3d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
Khammash v. Clark
145 So. 3d 246
La. 2014
Co., -81 (La.1985); see also, Hanks, 04-1485 at p. 9, 904 So.2d at 668 ; Williams, 449 So.2d at 458, n. 16 .
- New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New Orleans 131 So. 3d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- Stratmann v. Cardiovascular Specialists, Inc. 65 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Parish of St. Charles v. R.H. Creager, Inc. 55 So. 3d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
Richard J. Heath v. City of Alexandria, Louisiana
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Co., further citations 18 omitted).
-
Heath v. City of Alexandria
52 So. 3d 86
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., further citations omitted).
- Reed v. St. Charles General Hospital 11 So. 3d 1138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Stanford v. Town of Ball
999 So. 2d 304
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., further citations omitted).
-
Randy Stanford v. Town of Ball
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Co., further citations omitted).
- Boxie v. Lemoine 988 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- Sharon Boxie v. Dr. Dwight Lemoine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
Newman Marchive Partnership, Inc. v. City of Shreveport
979 So. 2d 1262
La. 2008
Co., further citations omitted).
-
Romero v. Elias
972 So. 2d 450
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co., the Supreme Court [sic] defined the Fund as a statutory intervenor "who has an interest in the proceedings between the claimant and the health care provider because any damages in excess of one hundred thousand dollars are payable by the Fund."
-
Peter Romero v. Darryl Elias, M.D.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co., the Supreme Court [sic] defined the Fund as a statutory intervenor “who has an interest in the proceedings between the claimant and the health care provider because any damages in excess of one hundred thousand dollars are payable by the Fund.” Id.
- Berthelot v. Patients' Compensation Fund Oversight Board 977 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- Sharon Boxie v. Dr. Dwight Lemoine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Boxie v. Lemoine 967 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
Baker v. MOREHOUSE PARISH SCHOOL BD.
956 So. 2d 121
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Co., Terral Barge Line Inc. v. Madison Parish Port Com'n, 22,251 (La.
-
Golden v. PATIENT'S COMP. FUND BD.
924 So. 2d 459
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Co., Terral Barge Line Inc. v. Madison Parish Port Com'n, 22,251 (La.
- Hanks v. Seale 904 So. 2d 662 La. 2005
- Hoag v. State 889 So. 2d 1019 La. 2004
- Randy Hanks v. Dr. A. Kent Seale La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Hanks v. Seale 872 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
-
Wilbert Rideau v. James R. Andrus, Clerk of Court
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., the supreme court stated: “It is well settled that mandamus will lie to compel performance of prescribed duties that are purely ministerial and in which no element of discretion is left to the public officer.
-
Rideau v. Andrus
868 So. 2d 223
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., the supreme court stated: “It is well settled that mandamus will lie to compel performance of prescribed duties that are purely ministerial and in which no element of discretion is left to the public officer.
-
Diana Weeks v. Louisiana Patients Compensation Fund
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Co., the Supreme Court defined the [PCF] as a statutory intervenor “who has an interest in the proceedings between the claimant and the health care provider because any damages in excess of one hundred thousand dollars are payable by the [PCF].” Id.
-
Weeks v. Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund
858 So. 2d 851
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Co., the Supreme Court defined the [PCF] as a statutory intervenor “who has an interest in the proceedings between the claimant and the health care provider because any damages in excess of one hundred thousand dollars are payable by the [PCF].” Id.
- Bennett v. Krupkin 798 So. 2d 940 La. 2001
- Coleman v. Deno 787 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
-
Snearl v. Mercer
780 So. 2d 563
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Co., as authority for its right to intervene in the pending appeal perfected by DOTD.
-
LeBlanc v. Barry
771 So. 2d 696
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
October 21, 1985), interpreted R.S.
- Zumo v. Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center 730 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
-
Authement v. Larpenter
713 So. 2d 718
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, (finding that LSA-R.S.
-
Alemeida v. Taylor
699 So. 2d 1121
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Co., Huszar v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board, 95-2594, p. 3 (La.App.
-
Distinguished
Alliance for Affordable Energy v. Frick
695 So. 2d 1126
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Louisiana Dept. of Treasury, (La.App.
-
Wilson v. Ouachita Parish School Bd.
694 So. 2d 596
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Clark v. City of Shreveport, 26,638 (La.App.
- Hays v. Volentine 694 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- McCrory v. JEFFERSON PARISH HOSP. SERV. 686 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
-
Huszar v. Tangipahoa Parish School Bd.
681 So. 2d 60
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., State ex rel.
-
Walker v. Rinicker
671 So. 2d 1267
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Co., Terral Barge Line Inc. v. Madison Parish Port Com'n, 22,251 (La.App.2d Cir. 4/3/91), .
-
Rey v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.
665 So. 2d 109
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Co., and that once a claim has been made against the Fund for excess damages, the plaintiff is required to prove the extent of his damages attributable to malpractice.
-
City of Monroe v. Lolley
660 So. 2d 94
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
-
Jones v. Traylor
660 So. 2d 933
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Co., which held that because the state legislature has specifically authorized a procedure in La.Rev.Stat.
-
Caddo Parish Fire Districts v. Clingan
649 So. 2d 156
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Co., Reynolds v. Hospital Service District # 1, (La.App.