DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State in Interest of Johnson, 475 So. 2d 340.

23 citing documents.

  • Rafael Antonio Mena Chavez A/K/A Sergio Balboa, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Children, Ingrid Mena Perez … La. 2024
    Furthermore, “[t]he separation of powers by our state constitution establishes an inherent judicial power which the legislative and executive branches cannot abridge.” State in Interest of Johnson, (La.
  • Pineville City Court v. City of Pineville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    2/13/14), in accord, State in the Interest of Johnson, (acknowledging that “[t]he separation of powers by our state constitution establishes an inherent judicial power which the legislative and executive branches cannot abridge.”) As such, Judge Hays is charged as the administrator of the court with the duty of insuring that the Court provides service t
  • DeJean v. Purpera 199 So. 3d 11 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
    State in Interest of Johnson
  • State v. Willis 185 So. 3d 86 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    In support of its ruling, the district court cites State in Interest of Johnson, which provides that a court’s power to furnish counsel for indigents includes the power to issue an order requiring the state to provide for the payment of counsel fees and expenses.
  • Pociask v. Moseley 122 So. 3d 533 La. 2013
    1st Cir.1985) (termination and abandonment statutes are similar because they both deal with the termination of parental rights, though for different reasons), aff 'd
  • State Ex Rel. Ap 815 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State ex rel. A.P. 815 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Bester v. SUPREME COURT COM. ON BAR ADM. 779 So. 2d 715 La. 2001
    State in Interest of Johnson, Singer, Hutner, Levine, Seeman, & Ex Parte Steckler, 154 So.
  • In Re Rodrigue 657 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    1st Cir.), affirmed, (1985), which recognized the duty to furnish counsel for indigent parents in termination proceedings instituted by the State.
  • State in Interest of SC v. DNC 639 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    See State in the Interest of Johnson, State in the Interest of C.P., (La.App.
  • State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
    This Court noted this limitation in State In Interest of Johnson, : The inherent judicial power may be aided by the legislative and executive branches, but their acts or failures to act cannot destroy, frustrate, or impede the court's inherent constitutional authority.
  • State v. Wigley 624 So. 2d 425 La. 1993
    550 , 15 L.Ed.2d 469 (1966) (involuntary uncompensated representation of an indigent involved no taking under 5th Amendment); State in Interest of Johnson, (under La.
  • State v. Wigley 599 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    See State in the Interest of Johnson, (La.
  • Distinguished In Re Compensation for Indigents'cr. Def. 580 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    State in Interest of Johnson, is clearly distinguishable on its facts and on the law that was there applied.
  • Distinguished State v. Clark 580 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    The court indicated, however, that if a district court “should” deny compensation to lawyers appointed for indigents, the supreme court, on proper facts, “will be open to receive and consider a proper application for relief.” State in Interest of Johnson, is clearly distinguishable on its facts and on the law that was there applied.
  • State ex rel. S.N. 573 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    Johnson, State in Interest of K. V, (La.
  • State ex rel. CAM 565 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    State In Interest of Johnson
  • State in Interest of HLD v. CDM 563 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    State In Interest of Johnson, State in Interest of K.V., supra; State in Interest of Moore, (La.App.
  • State, in Interest of Bradford 536 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    On appeal, the attorney requests that he be awarded an additional sum to compensate him for his time and efforts in pursuing this appeal, citing State in the Interest of Johnson
  • State in Interest of KV 524 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Konrad v. Jefferson Parish Council 520 So. 2d 393 La. 1988
    3rd Cir.1983); and to award a fee for the attorney, appointed by the court to represent an indigent natural parent in an abandonment proceeding, against the state agency which initiated the proceeding, State in the Interest of Johnson
  • In Interest of Von Rossum 515 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    1st Cir.1985), writ granted, (1985), affirmed (1985).
  • State v. Thomassie 490 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    State In Interest of Johnson