Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cann, 471 So. 2d 701.

230 citing documents.

State v. Yarls 527 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Wilson 526 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Guillot 526 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Tyler 524 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Roberts 522 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Brock 521 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Anderson 517 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Haywood 516 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Smith 516 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Michaels 516 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Trahan 520 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Nelson 518 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. LeBlanc 517 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Chiles 514 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Smith 511 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Francosi 511 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Craddock 511 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Garner 511 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Tatum 506 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Sims 505 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Logan 498 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Bennett 498 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Lutes 496 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Batista 496 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Brumfield 496 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Cann 494 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
2d Cir.1984), amended and affirmed
State v. Dawson 490 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Shelton 490 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Sims 483 So. 2d 1006 La. 1986
However, this policy has been invoked only to set aside sentences so disproportionate to the crime committed, in light of the harm caused to society, as to shock our sense of justice, either because each consecutive sentence itself was lengthy or because each crime was part of one unpremeditated transaction or both.
State v. Lester 482 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985