DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 475 So. 2d 331.

14 citing documents.

  • State v. Matthews 855 So. 2d 740 La. 2003
    which held that while La.R.S.
  • State v. Allen 824 So. 2d 344 La. 2002
    ("Where [the legislature] has failed to make its intention manifest, courts should proceed cautiously, remaining sensitive to the interests of defendant and society alike.
  • State v. Matthews 814 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    NOTES [1] the Louisiana Supreme Court held that that it was the intention of the legislature in drafting La.
  • State v. Gilliam 807 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that separate convictions for attempted forgery as a principal in the false endorsement of a check, and attempted forgery as a principal in the attempted transfer of the same check violated the principles of double jeopardy.
  • State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Smith 676 So. 2d 1068 La. 1996
  • State v. Thornton 611 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    4th Cir.1984), affirmed as amended
  • State ex rel. Restrepo v. State 593 So. 2d 1258 La. 1992
  • State Ex Rel. Nicholas v. State 520 So. 2d 377 La. 1988
  • State v. Bertram 517 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    At the conclusion of the trial the judge noted that the evidence proved defendant's guilt as to both counts, the judge found defendant not guilty as to count one and guilty as charged as to count two.
  • State v. Nicholas 491 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Jackson 488 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    the court held that it was the intention of the legislature in drafting R.S.
  • State v. Conger 483 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Of greater import however, which relates to sufficiency of the evidence is the recent case of State v. *1102 Smith wherein our Louisiana Supreme Court held that the imposition of separate convictions of and sentences for attempted forgery as principal in false endorsement of check and attempted forgery as principal in attempted transfer of same forged check violated the constitutional ban of double jeopardy.
  • State v. Briscoe 482 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Subsequent to our opinion in Briscoe, supra