Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sensley, 464 So. 2d 1374.

19 citing documents.

  • State v. Sopczak 25 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    App. 1st Cir. 1984), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Milstead 681 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    2d Cir. 1984), writ denied, may be one of the only other cases to date, where a defendant alleged his sentence was defective based in part on an incomplete PSI.
  • State v. Piazza 655 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. DeCuir 599 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Ashley 569 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. King 563 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Davis 550 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    2d Cir. 1984), writ denied (La.
  • State v. Chavis 542 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Neal 535 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied (La.
  • State v. Schenck 513 So. 2d 1159 La. 1987
    2d Cir.1984), writ denied, (Defendant was sentenced to six years at hard labor for sexual battery where the sixteen year old victim was abducted and raped at gunpoint.
  • State v. Delatte 506 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Coates 509 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    2nd Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Moss 488 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied, State v. Walker, 204 La.
  • State v. Pittman 486 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Buie 477 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    App. 1st Cir.1984), writ denied, this Court concluded the fact that defendant was the only black man seated at counsel table does not render the in-court identification inadmissible, although this factor is one to be considered by the jury in weighing the testimony of the in-court identification.
  • State v. Boudreaux 471 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied, the law applicable to determining the sufficiency of evidence in criminal cases is set forth as follows: a majority of the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that the United States Supreme Court case of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Starks 471 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    1st Cir. 1984); writ denied (La.
  • State v. Hamilton 470 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    1st Cir.1984), writ denied