DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Langford, 483 So. 2d 979.

59 citing documents.

  • State v. Major 140 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    the Court was faced with the defendant’s argument that the taking was consensual by the victim bank.
  • State v. Mercadel 120 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    However, the court stated that even one who takes another’s property intending only to use it temporarily before restoring it to its owner may nevertheless be guilty of larceny if he later changes his mind and decides not to return the property after all.
  • State v. Brumfield 104 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
    the Court was faced with the defendant’s argument that the taking was consensual by the victim bank.
  • State ex rel. J.W. 95 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State ex rel. J.W. 95 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State ex rel. C.D. 69 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Deanna Gaspard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Although we have compassion for the victims who suffered financial harm as a result of defendant's crimes, -11- (La.App.4th Cir.1985), writ denied, [eight years for a single count of theft: the defendant intentionally overdrew his bank account by more that $848,000]; (La.App.
  • State v. Gaspard 49 So. 3d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4th Cir.1985), writ denied, [eight years for a single count of theft: the defendant intentionally overdrew his bank account by more that $848,000]; (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Cb 28 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    State v. Langford, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/24/86), ; State v. Thomas, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. C.B. 28 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    § 15:438 provides that such evidence “must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” State v. Langford, 1985-1067 (La.2/24/86), ; State v. Thomas, 2002-1523, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State v. Thomas 840 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Stevenson 839 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Randle 750 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State, in Interest of Hn 717 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Clower 715 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    indicating that one who changes his mind after the taking, and decides not to return the property, may nonetheless be guilty under Louisiana's broadly sweeping theft statute.
  • State v. Henry 709 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. McNeely 691 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Allen 686 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Bowman 677 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Lewis 662 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Legaux 658 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
    Accord, Gyles, supra (murder); , 985 n11 (La.1986) (theft); State v. Fulghum, 242 La.
  • State v. Hunter 648 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Brumfield 639 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Segue 637 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Davis 633 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State in Interest of AG 630 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Ruiz 630 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Lee 640 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    However, Langford , affirmed on appeal to the Louisiana Supreme Court, held defendant’s actions in violation of LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Parker 627 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Fontan 624 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Allen 618 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Hudson 617 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Quatrevingt 617 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Hoskin 605 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. James 581 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Camp 571 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. George 570 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Elie 567 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Heck 560 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Mitchell 553 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Lubrano 550 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Freeman 544 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Lintzen 541 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Although we have compassion for the victims who suffered financial harm as a result of defendant’s crimes, writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Woods 526 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Williams 515 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State in Interest of TL 514 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Price 517 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Hernandez 513 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Vanvorst 505 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987