Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of New Orleans v. Ballansaw, 475 So. 2d 768.

21 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Tino T. Pierre La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
    App. 5th Cir. 1991) (recognizing that “in the interest of judicial economy, an appeal improperly taken in a misdemeanor case may be treated as an application for supervisory writs, thereby enabling the reviewing court to rule on the merits of the application”) ( (La.
  • State v. Loisel 812 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Stubbs 793 So. 2d 1254 La. 2001
    see also Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573, p. 2 (La.10/4/96), .
  • Karim v. Finch Shipping Co., Ltd. 718 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • Best Fishing, Inc. v. Rancatore 706 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Bernard Lumber Company, (La.App.
  • State v. Wheeler 665 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Winters 655 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    1 While the appropriate procedural vehicle for defendant to seek review of this misdemeanor conviction is an application for supervisory writs, in the past we have treated an appeal improperly taken in a misdemeanor case as an application for supervisory writs, See: (La.
  • State v. Bonnet 646 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Further, in the interest of judicial economy, (La.App.
  • Dufour v. Westlawn Cemeteries, Inc. 639 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Fraychineaud 620 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Brooks 595 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Williams 593 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Johnson 592 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
  • State v. LeCompte 584 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    City of New Orleans v. *368 Ballansaw, (La.App.
  • State v. Aguillard 567 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Cologne 562 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Maxwell 554 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    However, the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that the appropriate procedure for the court of appeal in such a circumstance is to "treat the appeal as an application for supervisory writs and to rule on the merits of the application."
  • Lord v. Broussard 526 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. St. Amant 504 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Boudreaux 504 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State ex rel. Porter v. Blackburn 481 So. 2d 623 La. 1986
    In re RAY QUINN PORTER, applying for reconsideration of the denied writ of September 27, 1985, ; the 14th Judicial District Court, Parish of Cal-casieu, No. 4088-81.