Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dill, 475 So. 2d 1106.

20 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Wayne Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    5 Cir. 1984), writ denied, (1985)).
  • State v. Ross 269 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    5 Cir. 1984), writ denied , (1985) ).
  • State v. Johnson 734 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    5th Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Hidalgo 668 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    5 Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. In the Interest of T.N. 650 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    5th Cir.1984), unit denied
  • State v. TN 650 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    5th Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Johnson 643 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    5th Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Bibb 626 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    5th Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Sparrow 612 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    5th Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Rader 609 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    5th Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.
  • Guillory v. Hayes 576 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    App. 3d Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
  • Newt Brown, Contractor, Inc. v. Michael Builders, Inc. 569 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    3d Cir.1985), writ denied .
  • State v. Moore 568 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    5th Cir.1984), writ denied the Fifth Circuit also considered whether deadly force was mandated by the situation, whether the victim was warned or whether the defendant could have aimed at a less vital area.
  • State v. Starks 549 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    (5th Cir.1984), writ denied State v. Gibson, supra .
  • Matherne v. Response Instrument Service & Engineering Corp. 533 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    5th Cir.), writ denied, (1985); Couhig's Pestaway Company, Inc. v. Pestaway, Inc., (La.App.
  • State v. Gibson 529 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    5 Cir.1984) writ denied that the adjudication of the defendant's culpability by the trier of fact focuses on a two-fold inquiry: 1) From the facts presented, could the defendant reasonably have believed his life to be in imminent danger and 2) Was deadly force necessary to prevent the danger.
  • W.V., Inc. v. Covington Management Corp. 529 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    5th Cir.1985), writ denied
  • Beacham v. Hardy Outdoor Advertising 520 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    App. 3d Cir.1985), writ denied, Falgoust v. Inness, 163 So.
  • Charrier v. Bell 496 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    3rd Cir.1985), writ denied, (1985); G. Woodward Jackson Co., (La.App.
  • State v. Cushman 481 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    5 Cir.1984), writs denied .