Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Garcia, 483 So. 2d 953.

99 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Taveon Malik Leary La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
is whether a rational factfinder, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the homicide was not committed in self-defense.”
State of Louisiana v. Kerri Seeney Monic La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
is whether a rational factfinder, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the homicide was not committed in self-defense”
State of Louisiana v. Demyron L. Skinner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
“[W]hen a defendant claims self-defense, the state has the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that he did not act in self-defense.”
State of Louisiana v. Edwin Paul Frinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
This court previously addressed the burden of proof when a defendant claims self-defense in a non-homicide case: When a defendant in a homicide case claims self-defense, the state has the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self-defense
State v. Frinks 274 So. 3d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
This court previously addressed the burden of proof when a defendant claims self-defense in a non-homicide case: When a defendant in a homicide case claims self-defense, the state has the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self-defense
State of Louisiana v. Vaschon S. Blount La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
When a defendant in a homicide case claims self-defense, the state has the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self- defense
State v. Ott 80 So. 3d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State Ex Rel. Jn 984 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Theriot 963 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. King 935 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Hebert 877 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Favorite, 03-425 at p. 6, 862 *1121 So.2d at 212 ; State v. Johnson, 01-1362, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Taylor 874 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
See, State v. Batiste, 96-1010 (La.App.
State v. Fielding 862 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Favorite 862 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Sprinkle, 01-137, p. 16 (La.App.
State v. Quiambao 833 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Paddio 832 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Steele 829 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Batiste, 96-1010, (La.App.
State v. Murray 827 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Elaire 820 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
3 Cir.1992), writ denied, 93-0051 (La.11/11/94)
State v. Chism 821 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Johnson 820 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Sprinkle, 01-137, p. 16 (La.App.
State v. Reed 809 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Sprinkle 801 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Charles 787 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
When a defendant in a homicide case claims self-defense, the state has the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self-defense
State v. Roberts 786 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Nelson 775 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. McBride 773 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir.1992), writ denied, 93-0051 (La.11/11/94); , this court stated: When a defendant in a homicide case claims self-defense, the state has the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self-defense
State v. Clark 774 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Brumfield, 93-2404 (La.App.
State v. Hudson 760 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Ross 743 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Touissant 734 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 1/27/98), ; writ denied, ; (La.
State v. Barnes 729 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Rainey 722 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Joubert 705 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir.1992), writ denied, 93-0051 (La.11/11/94), , the burden rests upon the defendant: When a defendant in a homicide case claims self-defense, the state has the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self-defense
State v. Batiste 708 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Williams 693 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Cummings 668 So. 2d 1132 La. 1996
State v. Hidalgo 668 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Scales 655 So. 2d 1326 La. 1995
State v. Pierre 653 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. In the Interest of T.N. 650 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. TN 650 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Woodburn 643 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Brumfield 639 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Brown 640 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Hawthorne 623 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
2d Cir.1991), writ denied ().
State v. Taylor 621 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Rader 609 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Hall 606 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
When a defendant in a homicide case claims self-defense, the state has the burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self-defense
State v. Jones 600 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
956 *880 (La.1986); (La.App.