Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Messiah, 538 So. 2d 175.
-
State v. Thomas
124 So. 3d 1049
La. 2013
1399, 1404 , 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012); State v. Messiah, 85-1659 (La.12/12/88), .
-
State v. Frank
957 So. 2d 724
La. 2007
1555 , 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995); (aff'd); State v. John Brown, Jr., (aff'd); (La.
-
State v. Harris
892 So. 2d 1238
La. 2005
1555 , 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995)(nolle prosequi); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); (aff'd), new penalty phase order by district court, review denied, 95-0262 (La.4/26/96), (life); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(acquitted); (rev'd)(life)
-
State v. Stewart
815 So. 2d 14
La. 2002
(on reh'g); ("Entirely satisfactory representation may include a brief closing argument intended to focus the jury's attention on a single item of strategy which counsel deems most likely to achieve a favorable verdict.").
- State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
-
State v. Hampton
750 So. 2d 867
La. 1999
196 , 88 L.Ed.2d 165 (1985), sentence vacated, (Vernon Parish); (Orleans Parish); (La.
-
State v. Frost
727 So. 2d 417
La. 1998
See State v. Scales, 93-2003 (La.5/22/95)
-
State v. Cooks
720 So. 2d 637
La. 1998
196 , 88 L.Ed.2d 165 (1985), sentence vacated, (Vernon Parish); (Orleans Parish); (La.
-
State v. Tyler
723 So. 2d 939
La. 1998
1330 , 79 L.Ed.2d 725 (1984); (La.
- State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
-
State v. Craig
699 So. 2d 865
La. 1997
See State v. Seales, 93-2003 (La.5/22/95)
-
State v. Strickland
683 So. 2d 218
La. 1996
1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990); -190 (La.1988), cert.
-
State v. Allen
682 So. 2d 713
La. 1996
1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990); cert.
- State v. Ross 674 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- State v. Scales 655 So. 2d 1326 La. 1995
-
State v. Sanders
648 So. 2d 1272
La. 1994
Clark, 492 So.2d at 872 ; Busby, 538 So.2d at 173 ; -89 (La.1988).
-
State v. Davis
637 So. 2d 1012
La. 1994
196 , 88 L.Ed.2d 165 (1985); (La.
-
State v. Stovall
631 So. 2d 1229
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
wherein the Supreme Court stated, as it had many times *1231 previously and since, that a trial judge’s ruling on admissibility and his conclusions as to credibility of witnesses are accorded great weight.
- Criticized State v. Wolfe 630 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
-
State v. Rice
626 So. 2d 515
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
certiorari denied, 493 U.S. 1063 , 110 S.Ct.
-
State v. Peart
621 So. 2d 780
La. 1993
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
-
State v. Sam
623 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
The holdings in these cases were diluted later by reference to several prior cases in which the court reviewed such instructions “as a whole ” to determine whether reasonable persons of ordinary intelligence would understand the definition of “reasonable doubt.”
-
State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Whitley
606 So. 2d 1292
La. 1992
[3] Subsequently, , 184 n. 5 (La.1988), cert.
-
State v. Christian
593 So. 2d 909
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
- State v. White 593 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. White 593 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Walters 582 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- State v. Patterson 572 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Cage 554 So. 2d 39 La. 1989
- State v. Lindsey 543 So. 2d 886 La. 1989