Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Messiah, 538 So. 2d 175.

30 citing documents.

  • State v. Thomas 124 So. 3d 1049 La. 2013
    1399, 1404 , 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012); State v. Messiah, 85-1659 (La.12/12/88), .
  • State v. Frank 957 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
    1555 , 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995); (aff'd); State v. John Brown, Jr., (aff'd); (La.
  • State v. Harris 892 So. 2d 1238 La. 2005
    1555 , 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995)(nolle prosequi); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); (aff'd), new penalty phase order by district court, review denied, 95-0262 (La.4/26/96), (life); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(acquitted); (rev'd)(life)
  • State v. Stewart 815 So. 2d 14 La. 2002
    (on reh'g); ("Entirely satisfactory representation may include a brief closing argument intended to focus the jury's attention on a single item of strategy which counsel deems most likely to achieve a favorable verdict.").
  • State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
  • State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
    196 , 88 L.Ed.2d 165 (1985), sentence vacated, (Vernon Parish); (Orleans Parish); (La.
  • State v. Frost 727 So. 2d 417 La. 1998
    See State v. Scales, 93-2003 (La.5/22/95)
  • State v. Cooks 720 So. 2d 637 La. 1998
    196 , 88 L.Ed.2d 165 (1985), sentence vacated, (Vernon Parish); (Orleans Parish); (La.
  • State v. Tyler 723 So. 2d 939 La. 1998
    1330 , 79 L.Ed.2d 725 (1984); (La.
  • State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
  • State v. Craig 699 So. 2d 865 La. 1997
    See State v. Seales, 93-2003 (La.5/22/95)
  • State v. Strickland 683 So. 2d 218 La. 1996
    1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990); -190 (La.1988), cert.
  • State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
    1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990); cert.
  • State v. Ross 674 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Scales 655 So. 2d 1326 La. 1995
  • State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
    Clark, 492 So.2d at 872 ; Busby, 538 So.2d at 173 ; -89 (La.1988).
  • State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
    196 , 88 L.Ed.2d 165 (1985); (La.
  • State v. Stovall 631 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    wherein the Supreme Court stated, as it had many times *1231 previously and since, that a trial judge’s ruling on admissibility and his conclusions as to credibility of witnesses are accorded great weight.
  • Criticized State v. Wolfe 630 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Rice 626 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    certiorari denied, 493 U.S. 1063 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Peart 621 So. 2d 780 La. 1993
    Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Sam 623 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    The holdings in these cases were diluted later by reference to several prior cases in which the court reviewed such instructions “as a whole ” to determine whether reasonable persons of ordinary intelligence would understand the definition of “reasonable doubt.”
  • State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Whitley 606 So. 2d 1292 La. 1992
    [3] Subsequently, , 184 n. 5 (La.1988), cert.
  • State v. Christian 593 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the two part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. White 593 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. White 593 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Walters 582 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Patterson 572 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Cage 554 So. 2d 39 La. 1989
  • State v. Lindsey 543 So. 2d 886 La. 1989