Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 496 So. 2d 261.
-
State v. Griffin
618 So. 2d 680
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
For a detailed discussion of the various factors to be considered in determining whether a change of venue is appropriate, writ denied
- State v. Cook 598 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
- State v. Melancon 596 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- State v. Burrell 561 So. 2d 692 La. 1990
- State v. Lee 559 So. 2d 1310 La. 1990
- State v. Brown 550 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Jackson 548 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Melbert 546 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Rexrode 536 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
-
State v. Richardson
529 So. 2d 1301
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
the Trial Court erred in denying the defendant's challenge for cause because under certain circumstances, it is unrealistic for a court to expect a prospective juror to be impartial.
- State v. Bennett 527 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Eaton 524 So. 2d 1194 La. 1988
-
State v. Walters
514 So. 2d 257
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
lists the factors to be considered in making this determination.
- State v. Prestridge 507 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
-
Distinguished
State v. Balfa
506 So. 2d 1369
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Defendant, urging that the second denial of his motion for a change of venue was error, argues on appeal the application of a recent Louisiana Supreme Court case, (La.