DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dean, 487 So. 2d 709.

14 citing documents.

  • State v. Nguyen 888 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Pittman 683 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    5th Cir.1986), this court set forth the standard used to determine the admissibility of allegedly gruesome photographs as follows: The test used in determining admissibility of photographs is whether the probative value of an allegedly gruesome photograph outweighs its prejudicial effect upon the jury, (La.App.
  • State v. James 665 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Sheppard 646 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Bibb 626 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    818 , 102 L.Ed.2d 807 (1989); (La.App.
  • State v. Sheppard 618 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Robinson 598 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    App. 5th Cir.1986), this court set forth the standard used to determine the admissibility of allegedly gruesome photographs as follows: The test used in determining admissibility of photographs is whether the probative value of an allegedly gruesome photograph outweighs its prejudicial effect upon the jury, (La.App.
  • State v. Pier 530 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Richard 525 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    5 Cir.1986), we stated, at 84: "The test used in determining admissibility of photographs is whether the probative value of an allegedly gruesome photograph outweighs its prejudicial effect upon the jury, (La.App.
  • State v. Freeman 517 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    5 Cir.1986), this court set forth the standard used to determine the admissibility of allegedly gruesome photographs as follows: The test in determining admissibility of photographs is whether the probative value of an allegedly gruesome photograph outweighs its prejudicial effect upon the jury, (La.App.
  • State v. Flowers 509 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Weiland 505 So. 2d 702 La. 1987
  • State v. Moore 498 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    The test used in determining admissibility of photographs is whether the probative value of an allegedly gruesome photograph outweighs its prejudicial effect upon the jury, (La.App.
  • State v. Dean 495 So. 2d 300 La. 1986
    Prior report: La.App., .