Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Groth, 483 So. 2d 596.

15 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Joseph B. Schmidt La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
1986), see also State v. Kraft, 86- 0155 ( La.
State v. Thomas 138 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Bobo, 03-2362, p. 4 (La.4/30/04), ().
State of Louisiana v. John Wesley Perry, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Perry 127 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Specifically, to show that the case has not prescribed, and asserts that the case should have been remanded with orders that the State establish the interruption of the prescriptive period.
State v. Sorden 45 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The Court stated: This Court has consistently held that the state “bears the heavy burden of showing that it is excused from trying the accused on a charge later than the period mandated by Article 578.”
State v. Tillman 997 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Romar 985 So. 2d 722 La. 2008
art. 579(A)(1), see, or the defendant cannot be tried for any cause "beyond the control of the state."
State v. Bobo 872 So. 2d 1052 La. 2004
State v. Quinones 864 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
4th Cir.10/17/98), ; (La.
State v. Chadbourne 728 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
State v. Manuel 720 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Estill 614 So. 2d 709 La. 1993
State v. Bradshaw 571 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. McCullough 566 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
is misplaced because of obvious factual differences between these cases and appellant's situation.