Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Romero v. Romero, 509 So. 2d 681.
-
Jack H. Shannon v. Julia Westrich Shannon
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
It is then incumbent upon the district court to “interpret the disputed provision[s] of the contract according to its text without reference to what might have been the result had the parties agreed to be governed by the applicable code articles.” (La.
-
Victoria L. Burns v. James M. Burns
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
The trial court in dismissing this argument, cited this Court’s (La.App.
-
Burns v. Burns
94 So. 3d 941
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The trial court in dismissing this argument, cited this Court’s (La.App.
-
Maureen Joyce Stout v. Larry Gene Stout, Sr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 4/08/98), (La.App.
-
Stout v. Stout
30 So. 3d 1186
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 4/08/98) , ; (La.App.
-
Aufrichtig v. Aufrichtig
796 So. 2d 57
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
3d Cir.04/08/98), ; (La.App.
- Boudreaux v. Boudreaux 745 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
-
Stout v. Stout
719 So. 2d 727
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir.1988), writ denied, (La.App.
- Slocum v. Slocum 712 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
-
Bland v. Bland
705 So. 2d 1158
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
3rd Cir.1988), writ denied, (La.App.
- Becker v. Becker 654 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-
Crumling v. Crumling
628 So. 2d 1194
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Apparently relying on Wagner v. Wagner, supra, and the authority it cites, (La.App.
-
Crumling v. Crumling
628 So. 2d 1194
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Apparently relying on Wagner v. Wagner, supra, and the authority it cites, (La.App.
- Ellefson v. Ellefson 616 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
-
Stream v. Stream
614 So. 2d 138
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
5th Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
- Kirby v. Kirby 579 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Coffey v. Coffey 554 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- Wagner v. Wagner 535 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
-
Romero v. Romero
512 So. 2d 427
La. 1987
Prior report: La.App., .