DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic, 514 So. 2d 524.

29 citing documents.

  • Charlie Johnson v. A. W. Chesterton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    “[R]easonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed unless manifestly erroneous.” Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Johnson v. Chesterton 210 So. 3d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    “[Reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed unless manifestly erroneous.” Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • McDougald v. St. Francis North Hospital, Inc. 137 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    In Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • James Smith v. City of Vidalia La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Smith v. City of Vidalia 86 So. 3d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Lake Charles Memorial Hospital (Isom T. Roy) v. City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Roy v. City of Lake Charles 81 So. 3d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Johnson v. City of New Orleans Police Department 4 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Juanita G. Guilbeaux v. Office of the District Attorney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Guilbeaux v. Office of Dist. Attorney 957 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Kevin Goodbeir v. Castille Marble & Granite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Goodbeir v. Castille Marble & Granite 883 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Francis v. Quality Brands, Inc. 870 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Leon Francis v. Quality Brands La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Lester v. Villa Pizza 2808 833 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • In Re Triss 820 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    3d Cir.1993)(quoting Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Parker v. Harper 803 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson, & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Huntsberry v. Martin Mills, Inc. 704 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson & Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Goodly v. Colston 692 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic, (La.App.
  • Cobb v. Kleinpeter 663 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic, -26 (La.App.
  • Cobb v. Kleinpeter 663 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic, -26 (La.App.
  • Donaldson v. Sanders 661 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Melancon v. LaRocca 650 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    Specifically, our reading of the case from which plaintiff takes these elements ( Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic, et al., ) reveals one of these elements to be " the accident is of a kind that does not occur in the absence of negligence...."
  • Migues v. Sagrera 620 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    Therefore Guilbeau is not applicable and the correct standard of review is the manifest error rule, (La.App.
  • Broussard v. Delchamps, Inc. 571 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    Miller v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., writ denied, Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic, writ denied
  • Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 546 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    Miller v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., supra ; Novak v. Texada, Et Al. Clinic, (La.
  • Ewing v. Aubert 532 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    1978); Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic, (La.
  • Daniels v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 532 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Such consent shall be valid and effective and is subject to proof according to the rules of evidence in ordinary cases.” (La.App.
  • Novak v. Texada 515 So. 2d 807 La. 1987
    Prior report: La.App., .