Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jinks v. Wright, 520 So. 2d 792.

30 citing documents.

Frank Collatt v. Barbara T. Boudreaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Scott, 496 So.2d at 273; (La.App.
Sherry Boothe and Barry Boothe, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Children, Amber and Amanda Boothe v. … La. 2019
This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Scott, 496 So.2d at 273; (La.App.
Dawn Nolen v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Scott, 496 So.2d at 273
Mukesh R. Zaveri, Et Ux. v. Dennis Lloyd Husers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Scott, 496 So.2d at 273; (La.App.
Zaveri v. Husers 224 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Scott, 496 So.2d at 273 ; (La.
LeBlanc v. Islam 164 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Scott, 496 So.2d at 273 ; (La.App.
Everette Davis, Jr., Et Ux. v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Scott, 496 So.2d at 273; (La.App.
Davis v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 78 So. 3d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Scott, 496 So.2d at 273 ; (La.App.
Davis v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. 78 So. 3d 190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Scott, 496 So.2d at 273 ; (La.App.
Nancy Taylor v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Scott, 496 So.2d at 273; (La.App.
Taylor v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 33 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Scott, 496 So.2d at 273 ; (La.App.
Boxie v. Lemoine 988 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Scott, 496 So.2d at 273 ; (La.App.
Sharon Boxie v. Dr. Dwight Lemoine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Scott, 496 So.2d at 273; (La.App.
Egle v. Egle 963 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Scott, 496 So.2d at 273 ; (La.App.
Rose Dove Egle v. John M. Egle, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
This rigorous standard is based upon the principle that “[w]hen there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact.” Scott, 496 So.2d at 273; (La.App.
Harvin v. ANPAC Louisiana Ins. Co. 944 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Scott, 496 So.2d at 273 ; (La.App.
Davis v. Lazarus 927 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
& Development, supra at 396; (La.App.
Martin v. Heritage Manor South 784 So. 2d 627 La. 2001
Scott, 496 So.2d at 273 ; (La.
Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc. 772 So. 2d 94 La. 2000
Scott, 496 So.2d at 273 ; (La.App.
Mustiful v. Strickland 732 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
This stringent standard is based on the principle that “[wjhen there is a jury, it is the trier of fact.” (La.App.
STATE, DOTD v. August Christina & Bros., Inc. 716 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
& Development, supra at 396; (La.App.
Doucet v. Doug Ashy Bldg. Materials, Inc. 671 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Jinks v. *1155 Wright, (La.App.
Daigle v. Legendre 619 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1st Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
Clayton v. State Dept. of Transp. & Development 599 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Willis v. LeTulle 597 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
1988) ($100,000 award for pain and suffering, mental anguish and permanent disability for plaintiff with ruptured lumbar disc); (La.App.
Miley v. La. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 599 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
3rd Cir. 1989), writ denied, (La.
Weaver v. Siegling 569 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals, (La.App.
Brossette v. Professional Transportation 562 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Jaffarzad v. Jones Truck Lines, Inc. 561 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Mallett v. State Farm Insurance Co. 553 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by