Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Westerfield v. LaFleur, 493 So. 2d 600.

68 citing documents.

Brown v. Yacht Club 685 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Bua v. Dressel 675 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Valentine v. Bonneville Ins. Co. 672 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
See also, (minor child struck by vehicle while attempting to cross highway to board school bus had a relationship with bus sufficient to constitute "entering into" the bus for purposes of "occupying" the covered vehicle).
Jackson v. Rogers 665 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Dunn v. Gentry 653 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Gaspard v. Northfield Ins. Co. 649 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd. 634 So. 2d 1180 La. 1994
Bell v. Allstate Insurance Co. 620 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Armstrong v. Hanover Ins. Co. 614 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
is misplaced because that case dealt with an entirely different definition than the one in Hanover's policy discussed above.
Schroeder v. BOARD OF SUP'RS 577 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Schroeder v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University 577 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd. 572 So. 2d 571 La. 1991
Byrne v. State Farm Insurance Co. 572 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
The focus should be upon ‘the relationship between the person and the vehicle, obviously of time and in distance.’ ” Westerfield v. Lafleur [ ], at 603 [La.1986] quoting Day v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company Inc., 420 So.2d [518] at 520 [La.App.
White v. Williams 563 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Oliver & Wool Construction Co. v. Metropolitan Erection Co. 524 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Carroll v. State Farm Ins. Co. 519 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Washington v. Allstate Ins. Co. 499 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Martinez v. Great American Ins. Co. 499 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986