Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boudreaux v. Panger, 490 So. 2d 1083.

14 citing documents.

Hoffman v. Theriot 249 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Clayton Bias v. Dr. Frederico Del Toro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3/17/95), ( and Felice v. Valleylab, Inc., (La.App.
Bias v. Del Toro 77 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/5/94), , writ denied, 95-158 (La.3/17/95), ( and Felice v. Valleylab, Inc., (La.App.
Coleman v. LA TERRE PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. 36 So. 3d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In Boudreaux v. Panger, D.C., the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed an appellate court decision, which held that a |4chiropractor, although not subject to the Medical Malpractice Act, should only be judged by the standard of her profession, and as a matter of law, “general negligence” of the *328 chiropractor is not available as a basis
Task v. Gates 770 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Sandell v. Hooter 692 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
App. 3 Cir. 10/5/94); , writ denied, 95-0158 (La.3/17/95); , Felice v. Valleylab, Inc., (La.App.
Fletcher v. Fenoli 674 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Ricker v. Hebert 655 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
App. 5th Cir.1986), aff'd, (La.
McCurdy v. Ault 654 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
McCurdy v. Ault 654 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Richard v. Wijayasuriya 645 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Felice v. Valleylab, Inc., (La.App.
Piazza v. Behrman Chiropractic Clinic, Inc. 601 So. 2d 1378 La. 1992
[2] Likewise, this court held a chiropractor to "the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other chiropractors in a similar community."
Piazza v. Behrman Chiropractic Clinic, Inc. 588 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Egudin v. Carriage Court Condominium, Dehrvill Group, Inc. 528 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988