Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., 500 So. 2d 748.

32 citing documents.

Lafayette Steel Erector, Inc. d/b/a LSE Crane and Transportation and IC Rigging, LLC v. G. Kendrick, LLC, Low … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., ( La.
James v. Ernest N. Morial New Orleans Exhibition Hall Auth. 262 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc. , , 751 (La.
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Veninata 971 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., (La.
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 833 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes , Blanchard v. Ogima , 253 La.
Hughes v. Goodreau 836 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Hoag v. State Ex Rel. Kennedy 836 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Cf. Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., Blanchard v. Ogima, 253 La.
Hoerner v. ANCO Insulations, Inc. 812 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
We do not believe that the supreme court in Rowell [ v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., ] [2] intended to expand the scope of Chappuis to impose manufacturer liability on all retailers who are simply in the business of selling a product.
Stokes v. Stewart 774 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc.
Systems Contractors Corporation v. Williams Architects 769 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[8] Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., Rivera v. United Gas Pipeline Co., 96-502 (La.App.
Slaid v. Evergreen Indem., Ltd. 745 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
See, e.g., Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., (finding, under "professional vendor" analysis, repossessing bank not liable as manufacturer of mobile home where it merely authorized repairs before resale); Parks, supra at 64 ("We believe that the legislature intended more direct and specific conduct on the part of the seller" where seller placed work
Coulon v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 734 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
See Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., Marshall v. Beno Truck Equipment, Inc., on reh'g, (La.App.
Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 738 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., Henry v. Taco Tio, Inc., (La.App.
Rivera v. United Gas Pipeline Co. 697 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc.
Stephens v. Bail Enforcement of Louisiana 690 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., [7] Blanchard v. Ogima, 253 La.
Independent Fire Ins. v. Able Moving & Storage Co. 650 So. 2d 750 La. 1995
The court of appeal cited Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., which stated: "Liability for the negligent and tortious acts of another does not flow simply because of a principal-agent or principal-mandatary relationship."
Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp. 639 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc.
Avery v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 621 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
In Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., the court stated: "A master or employer is liable for the tortious conduct of a servant or employee which is within the scope of authority or employment, but a principal is not liable for the physical torts of a non-servant agent.
Jenkins v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 619 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1st Cir.1984), affirmed on other grounds, this court held that the release of the primarily liable obligor extinguishes the obligation, and precludes recovery from the derivatively liable obligor.
Jenkins v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 619 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1st Cir.1984), affirmed on other grounds, this court held that the release of the primarily liable obligor extinguishes the obligation, and precludes recovery from the derivatively liable obligor.
Doe v. Roman Catholic Church 615 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc.
Davis v. Burlingame 607 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
and Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., (La.
Henry v. Taco Tio, Inc. 606 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc.
Doe v. ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS 602 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., (La.
Philippe v. Lloyd's Aero Boliviano 589 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
The relationship between principal and independent contractor and nonindependent contractor agents under Louisiana law is set forth in Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., Blanchard v. Ogima, 253 La.
Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 583 So. 2d 829 La. 1991
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc.
Urbeso v. Bryan 583 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc.
Urbeso v. Bryan 583 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc.
Daniels v. Dauphine 557 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., (La.
Lasseigne v. AMERICAN LEGION, NICHOLSON POST 38 543 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc.
Nelton v. Astro-Lounger Mfg. Co., Inc. 542 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Plaintiff contends that Fraenkel is a professional vendor based on the case of Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court, in deciding whether a bank which sold a mobile home through a mobile home dealer was a professional vendor, stated that the bank "was not a professional vendor or merchant because it was not in the business of selling mobile homes.
CAJUN ELEC. POWER CO-OP., INC. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. 528 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
1st Cir.1984) affirmed the first circuit noted that: [1] a. Civ.Code art. 2103, as amended by Act 431 of 1979, effective August 1, 1980, and in effect at the time of plaintiff's injury, provided a solidary obligation resulting from an offense or a quasi-offense shall be divided in proportion to each debtor's fault [footnote omitt
Pitre v. Ecko Housewares Co., Inc. 521 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc.