DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Teasdel v. Teasdel, 493 So. 2d 1165.

15 citing documents.

  • Hoddinott v. Hoddinott 253 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 3/31/99), , 1147 (citing Teasdel v. Teasdel , , 1166 n.1 (La.
  • Jennye Wrynn Baker Voyles v. James Thomas Voyles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Art. 112, as amended 1982 & 1986), emphasizes the authority of the court in this regard
  • Voyles v. Voyles 901 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Art. 112, as amended 1982 & 1986), emphasizes the authority of the court in this regard
  • McCarty v. McCarty 729 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • McAlpine v. McAlpine 679 So. 2d 85 La. 1996
    358 So.2d at 308-309, n. 12 (relying on Barham dissent in Montz )); ("[p]ermanent alimony is a pension which is designed to prevent a former spouse from becoming a public charge."
  • Hackett v. Hackett 591 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    Martin, supra, citing Teasdel v. Teasdel, *1285
  • Martin v. Martin 573 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    the Louisiana Supreme Court found that an ex-wife was in need of post-divorce alimony after a one-year termination date had been established by the trial court and approved by the appellate court.
  • Ducote v. Ducote 573 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
    4th Cir.1986), reversed ].
  • Martinez v. Martinez 556 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    in which the court stated that "permanent alimony is a pension which is designed to prevent a former spouse from becoming a public charge."
  • Siciliani v. Siciliani 552 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • Hogan v. Hogan 549 So. 2d 267 La. 1989
  • Cenac v. Cenac 538 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Also, another case involving LSA-C.C.
  • Solomito v. Solomito 535 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Perez v. Hogan 534 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    in which the Supreme Court held a husband must pay alimony retroactive to the filing of the rule by the wife.
  • Lindner v. Lindner 506 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    In arriving at its conclusion in Teasdel, , 1168 the Supreme Court reasoned as follows: There is no question that permanent alimony is a pension which is designed to prevent a former spouse from becoming a public charge.