Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Richard v. Broussard, 495 So. 2d 1291.

35 citing documents.

745 Olive Street, L.L.C. v. Optimal Wellness, LLC and Sreedevi Yerrapragada La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Donnie Pierre v. Kenneth W. Gardner and Candice B. Gardner La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Indulge Island Grill, L.L.C. v. Island Grill, L.L.C. 220 So. 3d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
ognized a lessor’s limited right to engage in “self-help” in the following scenario — “when the lessee breaches the lease by abandoning the premises, the |7lessor has the right to take possession of the premises as agent for the lessee and to relet the premises to a third party without canceling the lease or relieving, the lessee of his obligations under the lease contract.” (La.
Stroope v. Smith 199 So. 3d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
in support of his actions.
Kushi Healthcare, L.L.C. v. St. James Behavioral Health Hospital, Inc. 174 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Lobell v. Rosenberg, 2014-0060 (La.App.
Lobell v. Rosenberg 158 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
14 First, the lessor “may sue *884 to' cancel the lease and to recover accrued rentals due, or he may sue to enforce the lease and to recover both accrued rentals and future accelerated rentals (if the lease contains an acceleration clause).” Richard v. Broussard
501 Rue Decatur, L.L.C. v. VTM Properties, LLC 141 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Southpark Community Hospital, LLC v. Southpark Acquisition Company,llc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Southpark Community Hospital, LLC v. Southpark Acquisition Co. 126 So. 3d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Melissa Horacek v. Davelyn Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Horacek v. Watson 86 So. 3d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1001 Harimaw Court East, L.L.C. v. Blo, Inc. 66 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Delatte v. PALA GROUP, LLC 35 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 975 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
[4] See, (where lessor enforces lease by obtaining a money judgment against lessee, the lease remains in effect and lessee retains the right of occupancy); Lichtentag v. Bowens, 256 La.
Southern Marine Sales, Inc. v. Matherne 915 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
explained: Generally, when a lessee defaults on a lease agreement, the lessor has two options available: he may sue to cancel the lease and to recover accrued rentals due, or he may sue to enforce the lease and to recover both accrued rentals and future accelerated rentals (if the lease contains an ac
Pelleteri v. Caspian Group Inc. 851 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
System Fuels, Inc. v. Kennedy 858 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 1/12/94) , , unit denied, 94-0721 (La.5/6/94)
Bacon v. TRANSPORT SERVICE CO. 836 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Ken Lawler Builders, Inc. v. Delaney 837 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Girgis v. Macaluso Realty Co. 778 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Crawford v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF LA. 770 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
1 Cir.1985), amended on other grounds
Lea v. Jarrott 750 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
the court rejected lessor’s claim for accelerated rent where the lessor had reentered the premises and used them for its own business operations.
Bill Kassel Farms, Inc. v. Paul 690 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
4 Cir.1990), the court set forth the remedies available to a lessor when a lessee defaults on a lease.
Union Bank v. Cottonport Ins. Exchange 630 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Blanchard 620 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Connecticut General v. Melville Realty 591 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Malbrough v. Wallace 594 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
SUNBELT SEC. SERVICES v. Delahoussaye 572 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the remedies available to a lessor when a lessee defaults on a lease.
Gennings v. Newton 567 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Community Bank v. Motel Management Corp. 558 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Gulf Wide Towing, Inc. v. FE WRIGHT (UK) LTD. 554 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Ruston State Bank & Trust Co. v. Streeter 545 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
1st Cir. 1985), affirmed
Chapin v. Hayes Wrecker & Towing Service 532 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
The record is devoid of evidence that would indicate whether U.S. Rentals was still in control of the leased premises on the date the vehicle was towed (see, other than the letter from Ms. Davis which plaintiff introduced, without contesting its contents, into evi *490 dence.
Keever v. Knighten 532 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Placid Refining Co. v. Privette 523 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
1st Cir.1985), writ *870 granted, , affirmed on other grounds, (La.App.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by